Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24247210›Full record

ArticleMedical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre2014

The protective effect of hesperidin on methotrexate-induced intestinal epithelial damage in rats: an experimental study.

Can Acipayam, Ibrahim Bayram, Kenan Daglioglu, Figen Doran, Sema Yilmaz, Gülay Sezgin, Berna Totan Ateş, Ayşe Ozkan, Atila Tanyeli

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Protective Effects of 2-Amino-5,6-dihydro-4International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Can AcipayamDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Ibrahim Bayram
Kenan Daglioglu
Figen Doran
Sema Yilmaz
Gülay Sezgin
Berna Totan Ateş
Ayşe Ozkan
Atila Tanyeli
Cukurova University · TRScientific Research Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this experimental study was to evaluate the efficacy of hesperidin (HES) in protecting against methotrexate (MTX)-induced intestinal damage using histopathological and immunohistochemical techniques. MATERIALS AND

methodsSeventy-eight male Wistar albino rats were divided into 4 groups that received (a) saline only (control group), n = 19; (b) HES only, n = 19; (c) MTX only, n = 19, and (d) MTX plus HES, n = 21. On the first day of the study, a single dose of MTX (20 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally to group 3 and 4 rats. The HES (200 mg/kg) was administered by gavage for 5 days. For the MTX plus HES group, HES (200 mg/kg) was administered by gavage for 5 days after MTX treatment. Rats were sacrificed on the 2nd, 4th and 6th day of the study. Tissue samples from the jejunum were taken for histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis.

resultsOn the 4th day, crypt injury in the MTX plus HES group (1.00 ± 0.00) was less than that in the MTX group (2.00 ± 0.89; p < 0.05). The small intestinal damage score was lower in the MTX plus HES group (6.33 ± 0.82) as compared to the MTX group (8.00 ± 2.37). Inducible nitric oxide synthase and interleukin-8 levels were lower in the MTX plus HES group (65 and 25%, respectively) as compared to the corresponding values of the MTX group (80 and 52.5%, respectively). On the 6th day, the Ki-67 proliferation index in the MTX group (45%) was lower than that in the MTX plus HES group (76.67%) and the control group (p < 0.05). The small intestinal damage score was high in the HES group on the 4th day due to increased cellular infiltration. On the 6th day, the Ki-67 proliferation index rose in parallel with the decrease in cellular infiltration and therefore histopathological scoring. The proliferation-enhancing effect of HES also appeared in healthy rats.

conclusionHES seemed to have a protective effect against MTX-induced intestinal injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsGastrointestinal AgentsHesperidinInterleukin-8Intestinal MucosaIntestine, SmallKi-67 AntigenMaleMethotrexateNitric Oxide Synthase Type IIPeroxidaseRatsRats, WistarAntineoplastic AgentsGastrointestinal AgentsHesperidinInterleukin-8Ki-67 AntigenMethotrexateNitric Oxide Synthase Type IIPeroxidase

Identifiers

PMID24247210
PMCPMC5586843
OpenAlexW2039242804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.