Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24247168›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2014

Breathing new life into immunotherapy: review of melanoma, lung and kidney cancer.

Charles G Drake, Evan J Lipson, Julie R Brahmer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 222 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
222citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

222 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. First-Line Nivolumab and Relatlimab Plus Chemotherapy for Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: The Phase II RELATIVITY-060 Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Structure-guided engineering of CD112 receptor variants for optimized immunotherapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

162 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charles G DrakeDepartment of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, The Bunting Blaustein Cancer Research Building, 1650 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Evan J LipsonDepartment of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, The Bunting Blaustein Cancer Research Building, 1650 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Julie R BrahmerDepartment of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, The Bunting Blaustein Cancer Research Building, 1650 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
TRANSGENIC MODELS FOR PROSTATE CANCER AND AUTOIMMUNITYP50CA058236 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DENMEADE, SAMUEL R · 1992 to 2020
$43.9M
ONCOLOGY: CHEMOTHERAPY, IMMUNOLOGY, BIOLOGYT32CA009071 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Mary Y Armanios, Nilofer S. Azad · 1985 to 2026
$12.8M
Johns Hopkins University NCTN Lead Academic Site ProgramU10CA180802 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ARMSTRONG, DEBORAH K, BRAHMER, JULIE RENEE · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
Analysis of Lag-3 in Regulatory T Cell Function and Immune SupressionR01CA127153 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DRAKE, CHARLES G. · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS 1P50CA58236‑15NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058236NCI NIH HHS R01 CA127153NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009071NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously, clinical approaches to using the immune system against cancer focused on vaccines that intended to specifically initiate or amplify a host response against evolving tumours. Although vaccine approaches have had some clinical success, most cancer vaccines fail to induce objective tumour shrinkage in patients. More-recent approaches have centred on a series of molecules known as immune checkpoints-whose natural function is to restrain or dampen a potentially over-exuberant response. Blocking immune checkpoint molecules with monoclonal antibodies has emerged as a viable clinical strategy that mediates tumour shrinkage in several cancer types. In addition to being part of the current treatment armamentarium for metastatic melanoma, immune checkpoint blockade is currently undergoing phase III testing in several cancer types.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunotherapyKidney NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsMelanomaMolecular Targeted TherapyPrognosisCancer VaccinesImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

PMID24247168
PMCPMC4086654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.