Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24246819›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2014

Talking health, a pragmatic randomized-controlled health literacy trial targeting sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among adults: rationale, design & methods.

Jamie Zoellner, Yvonnes Chen, Brenda Davy, Wen You, Valisa Hedrick, Terri Corsi, Paul Estabrooks

Open access · greenAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jamie ZoellnerVirginia Tech, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, 1981 Kraft Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA. Electronic address: zoellner@vt.edu.
Yvonnes ChenVirginia Tech, Department of Communications, 107 Shanks Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.
Brenda DavyVirginia Tech, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Wallace Hall, 295 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.
Wen YouVirginia Tech, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 321A Hutcheson Hall, 24060, USA.
Valisa HedrickVirginia Tech, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Wallace Hall, 295 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.
Terri CorsiVirginia Tech, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, 1981 Kraft Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.
Paul EstabrooksVirginia Tech, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, 1981 Kraft Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.
Virginia Tech · US

Funding

SIPsmartER: A nutrition literacy approach to reducing sugar-sweetened beveragesR01CA154364 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI ZOELLNER, JAMIE · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA154364-01A1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) contributes to a wide range of poor health outcomes. Further, few US adults drink less than the recommended ≤8 oz per day; and individuals with low socioeconomic, low health literacy status, and in rural areas are even less likely to meet recommendations. Unfortunately, few SSB behavioral interventions exist targeting adults, and none focus on low health literacy in rural areas. Talking Health, a type 1 effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial targeting adults in rural southwest Virginia, was developed using the RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance). The primary aim of this pragmatic randomized-controlled trial was to determine the effectiveness of a scalable 6-month intervention aimed at decreasing SSB consumption (SIPsmartER) when compared to a matched contact physical activity promotion control group (MoveMore). SIPsmartER was developed based upon the Theory of Planned Behavior and uses health literacy strategies to improve comprehension of the intervention content among participants. MoveMore is based on a research-tested intervention that was adapted to address all theory of planned behavior constructs and health literacy principles. Secondary aims include additional health outcomes (e.g., physical activity, weight) and reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance indicators. This paper highlights the opportunities and considerations for developing health behavior trials that aim to determine intervention effectiveness, provide all study participants an opportunity to benefit from research participation, and collect key information on reach and the potential for organizational adoption, implementation, and maintenance with the longer-term goal of speeding translation into practice settings.

Indexed as

BeveragesDrinking BehaviorHealth BehaviorHealth LiteracyNutritive SweetenersRural PopulationAdultFemaleHealth EducationHealth PromotionHumansMaleNutritive SweetenersBehavioral researchBeveragesHealth literacyRandomized controlled trialResearch designRural population

Identifiers

PMID24246819
PMCPMC3939427
OpenAlexW2140474932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.