ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2013
Robust 3D-2D image registration: application to spine interventions and vertebral labeling in the presence of anatomical deformation.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiview 2D/3D image registration in minimally invasive pelvic surgery navigation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep-learning reconstructed lumbar spine 3D MRI for surgical planning: pedicle screw placement and geometric measurements compared to CT.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024Article
- Feature-based multimodal registration framework for vertebral pose estimation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024Article
- Reproduction of forearm rotation dynamic using intensity-based biplane 2D-3D registration matching method.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Realistic C-arm to pCT registration for vertebral localization in spine surgery : A hybrid 3D-2D registration framework for intraoperative vertebral pose estimation.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022Article
- Transfer learning from an artificial radiograph-landmark dataset for registration of the anatomic skull model to dual fluoroscopic X-ray images.Computers in biology and medicine · 2021Article
- Robust Orthogonal-View 2-D/3-D Rigid Registration for Minimally Invasive Surgery.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Fracture reduction planning and guidance in orthopaedic trauma surgery via multi-body image registration.Medical image analysis · 2021Article
- Drill-mounted video guidance for orthopaedic trauma surgery.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
- The Impact of Machine Learning on 2D/3D Registration for Image-Guided Interventions: A Systematic Review and Perspective.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Article
- Multi-body 3D-2D registration for image-guided reduction of pelvic dislocation in orthopaedic trauma surgery.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- To Align Multimodal Lumbar Spine Images via Bending Energy Constrained Normalized Mutual Information.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- Atlas-based automatic planning and 3D-2D fluoroscopic guidance in pelvic trauma surgery.Physics in medicine and biology · 2019Article
- Task-driven source-detector trajectories in cone-beam computed tomography: II. Application to neuroradiology.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2019Article
- Real-time, image-based slice-to-volume registration for ultrasound-guided spinal intervention.Physics in medicine and biology · 2018Article
- Clinical Translation of the LevelCheck Decision Support Algorithm for Target Localization in Spine Surgery.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2018Article
- Robotic drill guide positioning using known-component 3D-2D image registration.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2018Article
- Virtual fluoroscopy for intraoperative C-arm positioning and radiation dose reduction.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2018Article
- Planning, guidance, and quality assurance of pelvic screw placement using deformable image registration.Physics in medicine and biology · 2017Article
- Correction of patient motion in cone-beam CT using 3D-2D registration.Physics in medicine and biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a framework for robustly estimating registration between a 3D volume image and a 2D projection image and evaluate its precision and robustness in spine interventions for vertebral localization in the presence of anatomical deformation. The framework employs a normalized gradient information similarity metric and multi-start covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy optimization with local-restarts, which provided improved robustness against deformation and content mismatch. The parallelized implementation allowed orders-of-magnitude acceleration in computation time and improved the robustness of registration via multi-start global optimization. Experiments involved a cadaver specimen and two CT datasets (supine and prone) and 36 C-arm fluoroscopy images acquired with the specimen in four positions (supine, prone, supine with lordosis, prone with kyphosis), three regions (thoracic, abdominal, and lumbar), and three levels of geometric magnification (1.7, 2.0, 2.4). Registration accuracy was evaluated in terms of projection distance error (PDE) between the estimated and true target points in the projection image, including 14 400 random trials (200 trials on the 72 registration scenarios) with initialization error up to ±200 mm and ±10°. The resulting median PDE was better than 0.1 mm in all cases, depending somewhat on the resolution of input CT and fluoroscopy images. The cadaver experiments illustrated the tradeoff between robustness and computation time, yielding a success rate of 99.993% in vertebral labeling (with 'success' defined as PDE <5 mm) using 1,718 664 ± 96 582 function evaluations computed in 54.0 ± 3.5 s on a mid-range GPU (nVidia, GeForce GTX690). Parameters yielding a faster search (e.g., fewer multi-starts) reduced robustness under conditions of large deformation and poor initialization (99.535% success for the same data registered in 13.1 s), but given good initialization (e.g., ±5 mm, assuming a robust initial run) the same registration could be solved with 99.993% success in 6.3 s. The ability to register CT to fluoroscopy in a manner robust to patient deformation could be valuable in applications such as radiation therapy, interventional radiology, and an assistant to target localization (e.g., vertebral labeling) in image-guided spine surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.