Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24245981›Full record

ArticleACS chemical biology2014

A liquid array platform for the multiplexed analysis of synthetic molecule-protein interactions.

Todd M Doran, Thomas Kodadek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS chemical biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Small-molecule discovery through DNA-encoded libraries.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chemical Tools To Monitor and Manipulate Adaptive Immune Responses.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Todd M DoranDepartments of Chemistry and Cancer Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, Scripps Florida , 130 Scripps Way, Jupiter , Florida 33458, United States.
Thomas Kodadek
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Discovery and Treatment of the Early Autoimmune Reaction In Type 1 DiabetesDP3DK094309 · NIDDK · SCRIPPS FLORIDA · PI KODADEK, THOMAS J. · 2011 to 2011
$5.0M
Massively Parallel Identification of Protein LigandsR01GM090294 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI CRAVATT, BENJAMIN F, KODADEK, THOMAS J. · 2009 to 2013
$3.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS DP3 DK094309NIDDK NIH HHS DP3 DK094309-01NIGMS NIH HHS GM-090294NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM090294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic molecule microarrays, consisting of many different compounds spotted onto a planar surface such as modified glass or cellulose, have proven to be useful tools for the multiplexed analysis of small molecule- and peptide-protein interactions. However, these arrays are technically difficult to manufacture and use with high reproducibility and require specialized equipment. Here we report a more convenient alternative composed of color-encoded beads that display a small molecule protein ligand on the surface. Quantitative, multiplexed assay of protein binding to up to 24 different ligands can be achieved using a common flow cytometer for the readout. This technology should be useful for evaluating hits from library screening efforts, the determination of structure activity relationships, and certain types of serological analyses.

Indexed as

Coloring AgentsLigandsProtein Array AnalysisProtein BindingProteinsColoring AgentsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID24245981
PMCPMC3944025
OpenAlexW1967099579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.