Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24245913›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2013

Inclusion of multiple fragment types in the site identification by ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) approach.

E Prabhu Raman, Wenbo Yu, Sirish K Lakkaraju, Alexander D MacKerell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Automated pharmacophore hypothesis generator for SILCS-Pharm: ph4gen.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Computational Ligand-Binding Site Prediction.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E Prabhu RamanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy , 20 Penn Street HSF II, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 United States.
Wenbo Yu
Sirish K Lakkaraju
Alexander D MacKerell

Funding

Restoration of Tumor Suppression Activity in Malignant MelanomaR01CA107331 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WEBER, DAVID JOSEPH · 2006 to 2015
$5.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA107331NCI NIH HHS R01 CA107331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The site identification by ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) method identifies the location and approximate affinities of small molecular fragments on a target macromolecular surface by performing molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the target in an aqueous solution of small molecules representative of different chemical functional groups. In this study, we introduce a set of small molecules to map potential interactions made by neutral hydrogen bond donors and acceptors and charged donor and acceptor fragments in addition to nonpolar fragments. The affinity pattern is obtained in the form of discretized probability or, equivalently, free energy maps, called FragMaps, which can be visualized with the target surface. We performed SILCS simulations for four proteins for which structural and thermodynamic data is available for multiple diverse ligands. Good overlap is shown between high affinity regions identified by the FragMaps and the crystallographic positions of ligand functional groups with similar chemical functionality, thus demonstrating the validity of the qualitative information obtained from the simulations. To test the ability of FragMaps in providing quantitative predictions, we calculate the previously introduced ligand grid free energy (LGFE) metric and observe its correspondence with experimentally measured binding affinity. LGFE is computed for different conformational ensembles and improvement in prediction is shown with increasing ligand conformational sampling. Ensemble generation includes a Monte Carlo sampling approach that uses the GFE FragMaps directly as the energy function. The results show that some but not all experimental trends are predicted and warrant improvements in the scoring methodology. In addition, the potential utility of atom-based free energy contributions to the LGFE scores and the use of multiple ligands in SILCS to identify displaceable water molecules during ligand design are discussed.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationBinding, CompetitiveCatalytic DomainFactor XaHIV ProteaseHumansHydrogen BondingLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationMonte Carlo Methodp38 Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesProbabilityProtein BindingRibonuclease, PancreaticSmall Molecule LibrariesStatic ElectricityFactor XaHIV ProteaseLigandsp38 Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesRibonuclease, PancreaticSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID24245913
PMCPMC3947602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.