ArticlePloS one2013
Validation of SNP allele frequencies determined by pooled next-generation sequencing in natural populations of a non-model plant species.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Population genetic variation characterised through serial independent pool-seq: the Cyprus Genome Project.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Micropropagation of Cannabis sativa: genetic and epigenetic stability assessment over multiple generations.Journal of cannabis research · 2026Article
- Global stock structure of the Silky shark (PeerJ · 2025Article
- Sampling strategies for genotyping common bean (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Comparative genomics of rainbow trout (Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Going beyond consensus genome sequences: An innovative SNP-based methodology reconstructs different Ugandan cassava brown streak virus haplotypes at a nationwide scale in Rwanda.Virus evolution · 2023Article
- High-throughput estimation of allele frequencies using combined pooled-population sequencing and haplotype-based data processing.Plant methods · 2022Article
- Selection of Genome-Wide SNPs for Pooled Allelotyping Assays Useful for Population Monitoring.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- Use of DNA pools of a reference population for genomic selection of a binary trait in Atlantic salmon.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- Haploid, diploid, and pooled exome capture recapitulate features of biology and paralogy in two non-model tree species.Molecular ecology resources · 2022Article
- Article
- Benchmarking the performance of Pool-seq SNP callers using simulated and real sequencing data.Molecular ecology resources · 2021Article
- Article
- Genomic signatures of convergent adaptation to Alpine environments in three Brassicaceae species.Molecular ecology · 2020Article
- Multi-model seascape genomics identifies distinct environmental drivers of selection among sympatric marine species.BMC evolutionary biology · 2020Article
- High accuracy of pooled DNA genotyping by 2b-RAD sequencing in the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei.PloS one · 2020Article
- Article
- BSA-Seq Discovery and Functional Analysis of Candidate Hessian Fly (Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sequencing of pooled samples (Pool-Seq) using next-generation sequencing technologies has become increasingly popular, because it represents a rapid and cost-effective method to determine allele frequencies for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in population pools. Validation of allele frequencies determined by Pool-Seq has been attempted using an individual genotyping approach, but these studies tend to use samples from existing model organism databases or DNA stores, and do not validate a realistic setup for sampling natural populations. Here we used pyrosequencing to validate allele frequencies determined by Pool-Seq in three natural populations of Arabidopsis halleri (Brassicaceae). The allele frequency estimates of the pooled population samples (consisting of 20 individual plant DNA samples) were determined after mapping Illumina reads to (i) the publicly available, high-quality reference genome of a closely related species (Arabidopsis thaliana) and (ii) our own de novo draft genome assembly of A. halleri. We then pyrosequenced nine selected SNPs using the same individuals from each population, resulting in a total of 540 samples. Our results show a highly significant and accurate relationship between pooled and individually determined allele frequencies, irrespective of the reference genome used. Allele frequencies differed on average by less than 4%. There was no tendency that either the Pool-Seq or the individual-based approach resulted in higher or lower estimates of allele frequencies. Moreover, the rather high coverage in the mapping to the two reference genomes, ranging from 55 to 284x, had no significant effect on the accuracy of the Pool-Seq. A resampling analysis showed that only very low coverage values (below 10-20x) would substantially reduce the precision of the method. We therefore conclude that a pooled re-sequencing approach is well suited for analyses of genetic variation in natural populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.