ArticlePloS one2013
Adherence to international follow-up guidelines in type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal cohort study in Luxembourg.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does the implementation of an incentive scheme increase adherence to diabetes guidelines? A retrospective cohort study of managed care enrollees.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Factors associated with nonattendance at annual diabetes check-up in Ningbo, China: a case-control study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Adherence to the therapeutic guidelines recommendations among the people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity, frailty, or recent diagnosis, attended in primary health care centers in Spain: A cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- International Variability of Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes and Mortality in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Europe.Kidney & blood pressure research · 2023Observational
- DM management in HIV patients: the adoption of population health management to transform the chronic management of HIV.European journal of public health · 2022Observational
- Frequency of Follow-Up Attendance and Blood Glucose Monitoring in Type 2 Diabetic Patients at Moderate to High Cardiovascular Risk: A Cross-Sectional Study in Primary Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Adherence to guideline-recommended HbA1c testing frequency and better outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 5-year retrospective cohort study in Australian general practice.BMJ quality & safety · 2021Article
- Factors Associated with Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results of a Spanish Delphi Consensus.Journal of diabetes research · 2021Article
- Adherence to the National Guidelines for Follow-Up Protocol in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Greece: The GLANCE Study.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020Article
- Public health burden of pre-diabetes and diabetes in Luxembourg: finding from the 2013-2015 European Health Examination Survey.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Quality of diabetes care at the largest outpatient clinics in Vilnius.Acta medica Lituanic · 2016Article
- A set of four simple performance measures reflecting adherence to guidelines predicts hospitalization: a claims-based cohort study of patients with diabetes.Patient preference and adherence · 2016Article
- Translational research in nephrology: chronic kidney disease prevention and public health.Clinical kidney journal · 2015Review
- Health care services provided to type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients in Saudi Arabia.Saudi medical journal · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionType 2 diabetes is associated with severe micro- and macro-vascular complications. Physicians' and patients' adherence to follow-up guidelines permits postponing or reducing these complications. The objectives were to assess the level of adherence to fundamental follow-up guidelines and determine patients' characteristics associated with this level of adherence in the context of Luxembourg, where no guidelines were implemented. STUDY POPULATION: The exhaustive residing population treated for type 2 diabetes in Luxembourg during the 2000-2006 period (N = 21,068).
methodsSeven fundamental criteria were extracted from international guidelines (consultation with the treating physician, HbA1c tests, electrocardiogram, retinal, dental, lipid and renal check-ups). The factors associated with the level of adherence to those criteria were identified using a partial proportional odds model.
resultsIn 2006, despite 90% of the patients consulted at least 4 times their treating physician, only 0.6% completed all criteria; 55.0% had no HbA1c test (-8.6 points since 2000) and 31.1% had a renal check-up (+21.6 points). The sex (OR(male): 0.87 [95%CI, 0.83-0.92]), the nationality (OR(NonEU): 0.64 [0.52-0.78]), the type of antidiabetic treatment (ORoral: 1.48 [1.35-1.63], OR(mixed): 1.35 [1.20-1.52]) and the type of treating physician (ORG-ID: 0.47 [0.42-0.53]) were the main factors associated with the level of adherence in 2006 (3 or more criteria).
conclusionA large percentage of patients were not provided with a systematic annual follow-up between 2000 and 2006. This study highlighted the necessity to promote guidelines in Luxembourg, education for physicians and to launch a national discussion on a disease management program for diabetic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.