Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24244629›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Drosophila growth cones advance by forward translocation of the neuronal cytoskeletal meshwork in vivo.

Douglas H Roossien, Phillip Lamoureux, David Van Vactor, Kyle E Miller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Extremely Low Forces Induce Extreme Axon Growth.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. An Integrated Cytoskeletal Model of Neurite Outgrowth.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Role of kinesin-1-based microtubule sliding in Drosophila nervous system development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Douglas H RoossienCell and Molecular Biology Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Phillip Lamoureux
David Van Vactor
Kyle E Miller
Michigan State University · USHarvard University · USMichigan United · US

Funding

GENES ESSENTIAL TO MOTOR AXON GUIDANCE IN DROSOPHILIAR01NS035909 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI VAN VACTOR, DAVID L. · 1997 to 2009
$3.9M
NINDS NIH HHS NS35909NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS035909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro studies conducted in Aplysia and chick sensory neurons indicate that in addition to microtubule assembly, long microtubules in the C-domain of the growth cone move forward as a coherent bundle during axonal elongation. Nonetheless, whether this mode of microtubule translocation contributes to growth cone motility in vivo is unknown. To address this question, we turned to the model system Drosophila. Using docked mitochondria as fiduciary markers for the translocation of long microtubules, we first examined motion along the axon to test if the pattern of axonal elongation is conserved between Drosophila and other species in vitro. When Drosophila neurons were cultured on Drosophila extracellular matrix proteins collected from the Drosophila Kc167 cell line, docked mitochondria moved in a pattern indicative of bulk microtubule translocation, similar to that observed in chick sensory neurons grown on laminin. To investigate whether the C-domain is stationary or advances in vivo, we tracked the movement of mitochondria during elongation of the aCC motor neuron in stage 16 Drosophila embryos. We found docked mitochondria moved forward along the axon shaft and in the growth cone C-domain. This work confirms that the physical mechanism of growth cone advance is similar between Drosophila and vertebrate neurons and suggests forward translocation of the microtubule meshwork in the axon underlies the advance of the growth cone C-domain in vivo. These results highlight the need for incorporating en masse microtubule translocation, in addition to assembly, into models of axonal elongation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsCell LineCell ProliferationCells, CulturedDrosophila melanogasterExtracellular MatrixGrowth ConesMicrotubulesMitochondriaMovementSensory Receptor CellsVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID24244629
PMCPMC3823856
OpenAlexW2145602847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.