ArticlePloS one2013
Cognitive-motor interference while grasping, lifting and holding objects.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Combining Occupationally Relevant Physical and Cognitive Tasks. A Systematic Review.Annals of work exposures and health · 2023Pooled it
- Attentional capture for tool images is driven by the head end of the tool, not the handle.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2016Trial
- Multi-gesture drag-and-drop decoding in a 2D iBCI control task.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Control of precision grip in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2025Article
- Effortfulness of visual working memory: Gauged by physical exertion.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2023Article
- Vision and Visuomotor Performance Following Acute Ischemic Stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Aging and Bimanual Effects on Finger Center of Pressure during Precision Grip: Different Strategies for Spatial Stability.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The effects of anxiety and dual-task on upper limb motor control of chronic stroke survivors.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Correspondence effect driven by salient visual asymmetries in integral object stimuli.Psychological research · 2020Article
- Article
- Hear speech, change your reach: changes in the left-hand grasp-to-eat action during speech processing.Experimental brain research · 2018Article
- The effect of fidget spinners on fine motor control.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- A framework for identifying the adaptations responsible for differences in pegboard times between middle-aged and older adults.Experimental gerontology · 2017Article
- Mind Your Grip: Even Usual Dexterous Manipulation Requires High Level Cognition.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2017Article
- Movement Interferes with Visuospatial Working Memory during the Encoding: An ERP Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- Performing Isometric Force Control in Combination with a Cognitive Task: A Multidimensional Assessment.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In daily life, object manipulation is usually performed concurrently to the execution of cognitive tasks. The aim of the present study was to determine which aspects of precision grip require cognitive resources using a motor-cognitive dual-task paradigm. Eighteen healthy participants took part in the experiment, which comprised two conditions. In the first condition, participants performed a motor task without any concomitant cognitive task. They were instructed to grip, lift and hold an apparatus incorporating strain gauges allowing a continuous measurement of the force perpendicular to each contact surface (grip force, GF) as well as the total tangential force applied on the object (load force, LF). In the second condition, participants performed the same motor task while concurrently performing a cognitive task consisting in a complex visual search combined with counting. In the dual-task condition, we found a significant increase in the duration of the preload phase (time between initial contact of the fingers with the apparatus and onset of the load force), as well as a significant increase of the grip force during the holding phase, indicating that the cognitive task interfered with the initial force scaling performed during the preload phase and the fine-tuning of grip force during the hold phase. These findings indicate that these aspects of precision grip require cognitive resources. In contrast, other aspects of the precision grip, such as the temporal coupling between grip and load forces, were not affected by the cognitive task, suggesting that they reflect more automatic processes. Taken together, our results suggest that assessing the dynamic and temporal parameters of precision grip in the context of a concurrent cognitive task may constitute a more ecological and better-suited tool to characterize motor dysfunction in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.