Trial reportPloS one2013
MS cortical lesions on DIR: not quite what they seem?
Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging cortical multiple sclerosis lesions with ultra-high field MRI.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2021Pooled it
- Evidence-based guidelines: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of MRI in multiple sclerosis-clinical implementation in the diagnostic process.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2015Guideline
- Whole-brain in situ postmortem MR imaging using a combination of sequences for cortical lesion detection in multiple sclerosis.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Article
- The corticospinal tract in multiple sclerosis: correlation between cortical excitability and magnetic resonance imaging measures.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025Article
- Multicenter Evaluation of AI-generated DIR and PSIR for Cortical and Juxtacortical Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Detection.Radiology · 2023Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Patients : Review.Clinical neuroradiology · 2022Review
- Artificial double inversion recovery images for (juxta)cortical lesion visualization in multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2022Article
- Histopathology-validated recommendations for cortical lesion imaging in multiple sclerosis.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2020Article
- Assessment of lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis: practical guidelines.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2019Review
- Monitoring Progressive Multiple Sclerosis with Novel Imaging Techniques.Neurology and therapy · 2018Review
- Abnormal task driven neural oscillations in multiple sclerosis: A visuomotor MEG study.Human brain mapping · 2017Article
- The value of qualitative and quantitative assessment of lesion to cerebral cortex signal ratio on double inversion recovery sequence in the differentiation of demyelinating plaques from non-specific T2 hyperintensities.European radiology · 2017Article
- The relationship between cortical lesions and periventricular NAWM abnormalities suggests a shared mechanism of injury in primary-progressive MS.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2017Article
- Article
- Manual Segmentation of MS Cortical Lesions Using MRI: A Comparison of 3 MRI Reading Protocols.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2016Article
- Automated patient-specific optimization of three-dimensional double-inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2016Article
- Phase-Sensitive Inversion-Recovery MRI Improves Longitudinal Cortical Lesion Detection in Progressive MS.PloS one · 2016Article
- Juxtacortical Lesions and Cortical Thinning in Multiple Sclerosis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2015Article
- Association of Cortical Lesion Burden on 7-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Cognition and Disability in Multiple Sclerosis.JAMA neurology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAccurate identification and localization of cortical gray matter (CGM) lesions in MS is important when determining their clinical relevance. Double inversion recovery (DIR) scans have been widely used to detect MS CGM lesions. Phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) scans have a higher signal to noise, and can therefore be obtained at a higher resolution within clinically acceptable times. This enables detection of more CGM lesions depicting a clearer cortical and juxtacortical anatomy. In this study, we systematically investigated if the use of high resolution PSIR scans changes the classification of CGM lesions, when compared with standard resolution DIR scans.
methods60 patients [30 RR(Relapsing remitting) and 15 each with PP(Primary progressive) and SP(Secondary progressive) MS] were scanned on a 3T Philips Achieva MRI scanner. Images acquired included DIR (1×1×3 mm resolution) and PSIR (0.5×0.5×2 mm). CGM lesions were detected and classified on DIR as intracortical (IC) or leucocortical (LC). We then examined these lesions on corresponding slices of the high resolution PSIR scans and categorized them as IC, LC, Juxtacortical white matter (JC-WM, abutting but not entering cortex) and other white matter (WM, not juxtacortical). Classifications using both scans were noted.
results282 IC and 483 LC were identified on DIR. Of the IC lesions, 61% were confirmed as IC on PSIR, 35.5% were reclassified as LC and 3.5% as JC-WM or other WM only. Of the LC DIR lesions, 43.9% were confirmed at LC on PSIR, 16.1% were reclassified as IC and 40% as JC-WM or other WM only. Overall, 50% (381/765) of CGM lesions seen on DIR were reclassified, and 26.5% (203/765) affected WM only.
conclusionsWhen compared with higher resolution PSIR, a significant proportion of lesions classified as involving CGM on DIR appear to either contain more white matter than expected or to not involve CGM at all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.