Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24244272›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

Speak fast, use jargon, and don't repeat yourself: a randomized trial assessing the effectiveness of online videos to supplement emergency department discharge instructions.

Clare L Atzema, Peter C Austin, Libo Wu, Michael Brzozowski, Michael J Feldman, Michael McDonnell, Laurie Mazurik

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01361932 nacompletednot on this map

Speak Fast, Use Jargon, and Don't Repeat Yourself: Using Online Videos to Supplement Emergency Department Discharge Instructions

TypeinterventionalSponsorSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRan2011 to 2013Enrolled133ConditionsEmergency Department Discharge Instructions, Instruction VideosArmsVideo of ED discharge instructions for patient's ED discharge diagnosis
NCT02882256 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Video Discharge Instructions (VDI) as Adjuncts to Written Discharge Instructions for 3 Common Chief Complaints in the Emergency Department (ED)

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorge Washington UniversityRan2016 to 2018Enrolled193ConditionsUrinary Tract Infection, Head Injury, LacerationArmsVideo discharge instructions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Scoping Review of Adult Emergency Department Discharge Interventions.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clare L AtzemaThe Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ; The Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Peter C Austin
Libo Wu
Michael Brzozowski
Michael J Feldman
Michael McDonnell
Laurie Mazurik

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency department discharge instructions are variably understood by patients, and in the setting of emergency department crowding, innovations are needed to counteract shortened interaction times with the physician. We evaluated the effect of viewing an online video of diagnosis-specific discharge instructions on patient comprehension and recall of instructions.

methodsIn this prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial conducted between November 2011 and January 2012, we randomized emergency department patients who were discharged with one of 38 diagnoses to either view (after they left the emergency department) a vetted online video of diagnosis-specific discharge instructions, or to usual care. Patients were subsequently contacted by telephone and asked three standardized questions about their discharge instructions; one point was awarded for each correct answer. Using an intention-to-treat analysis, differences between groups were assessed using univariate testing, and with logistic regression that accounted for clustering on managing physician. A secondary outcome measure was patient satisfaction with the videos, on a 10-point scale.

resultsAmong 133 patients enrolled, mean age was 46.1 (s.d.D. 21.5) and 55% were female. Patients in the video group had 19% higher mean scores (2.5, s.d. 0.7) than patients in the control group (2.1, s.d. 0.8) (p=0.002). After adjustment for patient age, sex, first language, triage acuity score, and clustering, the odds of achieving a fully correct score (3 out of 3) were 3.5 (95% CI, 1.7 to 7.2) times higher in the video group, compared to the control group. Among those who viewed the videos, median rating of the videos was 10 (IQR 8 to 10).

conclusionsIn this single-center trial, patients who viewed an online video of their discharge instructions scored higher on their understanding of key concepts around their diagnosis and subsequent care. Those who viewed the videos found them to be a helpful addition to standard care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01361932 http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01361932?term=nct01361932&rank=1.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalInternetPatient DischargePatient SatisfactionVideo RecordingFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID24244272
PMCPMC3823877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.