Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24244177›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2013

Removal of misincorporated ribonucleotides from prokaryotic genomes: an unexpected role for nucleotide excision repair.

Alexandra Vaisman, John P McDonald, Donald Huston, Wojciech Kuban, Lili Liu, Bennett Van Houten, Roger Woodgate

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ribonucleotide errors, RNase HII, and ribonucleotide excision repair.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  2. DNA polymerase I: structure, activity, and function in bacterial DNA replication and repair.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. How RNA impacts DNA repair.DNA repair · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Bacterial DNA excision repair pathways.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandra VaismanLaboratory of Genomic Integrity, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
John P McDonald
Donald Huston
Wojciech Kuban
Lili Liu
Bennett Van Houten
Roger Woodgate
National Human Genome Research Institute · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

DNA Replication, Repair, and Mutagenesis In Eukaryotic And Prokaryotic CellsZIAHD001500 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI WOODGATE, ROGER · 2009 to 2025
$37.5M
DNA damage recognition by nucleotide excision repair proteinsR01ES019566 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI VAN HOUTEN, BENNETT · 2011 to 2020
$3.9M
Intramural NIH HHSNIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES019566NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES019566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stringent steric exclusion mechanisms limit the misincorporation of ribonucleotides by high-fidelity DNA polymerases into genomic DNA. In contrast, low-fidelity Escherichia coli DNA polymerase V (pol V) has relatively poor sugar discrimination and frequently misincorporates ribonucleotides. Substitution of a steric gate tyrosine residue with alanine (umuC_Y11A) reduces sugar selectivity further and allows pol V to readily misincorporate ribonucleotides as easily as deoxynucleotides, whilst leaving its poor base-substitution fidelity essentially unchanged. However, the mutability of cells expressing the steric gate pol V mutant is very low due to efficient repair mechanisms that are triggered by the misincorporated rNMPs. Comparison of the mutation frequency between strains expressing wild-type and mutant pol V therefore allows us to identify pathways specifically directed at ribonucleotide excision repair (RER). We previously demonstrated that rNMPs incorporated by umuC_Y11A are efficiently removed from DNA in a repair pathway initiated by RNase HII. Using the same approach, we show here that mismatch repair and base excision repair play minimal back-up roles in RER in vivo. In contrast, in the absence of functional RNase HII, umuC_Y11A-dependent mutagenesis increases significantly in ΔuvrA, uvrB5 and ΔuvrC strains, suggesting that rNMPs misincorporated into DNA are actively repaired by nucleotide excision repair (NER) in vivo. Participation of NER in RER was confirmed by reconstituting ribonucleotide-dependent NER in vitro. We show that UvrABC nuclease-catalyzed incisions are readily made on DNA templates containing one, two, or five rNMPs and that the reactions are stimulated by the presence of mispaired bases. Similar to NER of DNA lesions, excision of rNMPs proceeds through dual incisions made at the 8(th) phosphodiester bond 5' and 4(th)-5(th) phosphodiester bonds 3' of the ribonucleotide. Ribonucleotides misinserted into DNA can therefore be added to the broad list of helix-distorting modifications that are substrates for NER.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA RepairEndodeoxyribonucleasesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGenome, BacterialMutationProkaryotic CellsRibonuclease HRibonucleotidesDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA polymerase V, E coliEndodeoxyribonucleasesendodeoxyribonuclease uvrABCEscherichia coli ProteinsRibonuclease Hribonuclease HIIRibonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID24244177
PMCPMC3820734
OpenAlexW2144683765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.