ArticlePLoS computational biology2013
Comparing algorithms that reconstruct cell lineage trees utilizing information on microsatellite mutations.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- TyCHE enables time-resolved lineage tracing of heterogeneously-evolving populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Machine learning based lineage tree reconstruction improved with knowledge of higher level relationships between cells and genomic barcodes.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Empirical single-cell tracking and cell-fate simulation reveal dual roles of p53 in tumor suppression.eLife · 2022Article
- Recent advances in single-cell sequencing technologies.Precision clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Retrospective cell lineage reconstruction in humans by using short tandem repeats.Cell reports methods · 2021Article
- Clonal tracking using embedded viral barcoding and high-throughput sequencing.Nature protocols · 2020Article
- RETrace: simultaneous retrospective lineage tracing and methylation profiling of single cells.Genome research · 2020Article
- Article
- A metabolic perspective of Peto's paradox and cancer.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015Review
- The overdue promise of short tandem repeat variation for heritability.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2014Review
- Lineage grammars: describing, simulating and analyzing population dynamics.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organism cells proliferate and die to build, maintain, renew and repair it. The cellular history of an organism up to any point in time can be captured by a cell lineage tree in which vertices represent all organism cells, past and present, and directed edges represent progeny relations among them. The root represents the fertilized egg, and the leaves represent extant and dead cells. Somatic mutations accumulated during cell division endow each organism cell with a genomic signature that is unique with a very high probability. Distances between such genomic signatures can be used to reconstruct an organism's cell lineage tree. Cell populations possess unique features that are absent or rare in organism populations (e.g., the presence of stem cells and a small number of generations since the zygote) and do not undergo sexual reproduction, hence the reconstruction of cell lineage trees calls for careful examination and adaptation of the standard tools of population genetics. Our lab developed a method for reconstructing cell lineage trees by examining only mutations in highly variable microsatellite loci (MS, also called short tandem repeats, STR). In this study we use experimental data on somatic mutations in MS of individual cells in human and mice in order to validate and quantify the utility of known lineage tree reconstruction algorithms in this context. We employed extensive measurements of somatic mutations in individual cells which were isolated from healthy and diseased tissues of mice and humans. The validation was done by analyzing the ability to infer known and clear biological scenarios. In general, we found that if the biological scenario is simple, almost all algorithms tested can infer it. Another somewhat surprising conclusion is that the best algorithm among those tested is Neighbor Joining where the distance measure used is normalized absolute distance. We include our full dataset in Tables S1, S2, S3, S4, S5 to enable further analysis of this data by others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.