Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24243859›Full record

ReviewNucleic acids research2014

Protein-DNA binding: complexities and multi-protein codes.

Trevor Siggers, Raluca Gordân

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleic acids research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. From homogeneity to heterogeneity: Refining stochastic simulations of gene regulation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Trevor SiggersDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA, Departments of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Computer Science, and Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Raluca Gordân

Funding

The role of HMGA1 proteins in modulating NF-kB-dependent gene regulationK22AI093793 · NIAID · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI SIGGERS, TREVOR · 2012 to 2013
$265k
NIAID NIH HHS K22 AI093793NIAID NIH HHS K22AI093793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binding of proteins to particular DNA sites across the genome is a primary determinant of specificity in genome maintenance and gene regulation. DNA-binding specificity is encoded at multiple levels, from the detailed biophysical interactions between proteins and DNA, to the assembly of multi-protein complexes. At each level, variation in the mechanisms used to achieve specificity has led to difficulties in constructing and applying simple models of DNA binding. We review the complexities in protein-DNA binding found at multiple levels and discuss how they confound the idea of simple recognition codes. We discuss the impact of new high-throughput technologies for the characterization of protein-DNA binding, and how these technologies are uncovering new complexities in protein-DNA recognition. Finally, we review the concept of multi-protein recognition codes in which new DNA-binding specificities are achieved by the assembly of multi-protein complexes.

Indexed as

DNADNA-Binding ProteinsProtein BindingDNADNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24243859
PMCPMC3936734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.