Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24243012›Full record

ReviewCell2013

An integrated overview of HIV-1 latency.

Debbie S Ruelas, Warner C Greene

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 216 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
216citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

216 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 323 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Traditional Medicine Extracts ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

156 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Debbie S RuelasGladstone Institute of Virology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Warner C Greene
Gladstone Institutes · US

Funding

Using NK Cells to eliminate the latent HIV reservoirU19AI096113 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WOELK, CHRISTOPHER H · 2011 to 2015
$39.5M
Microbial Pathogenesis and Host DefenseT32AI060537 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Joanne N. Engel · 2004 to 2026
$6.5M
NIAID NIH HHS 5 T32 AI60537-9NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI060537NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI096113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant advances in our understanding of HIV, a cure has not been realized for the more than 34 million infected with this virus. HIV is incurable because infected individuals harbor cells where the HIV provirus is integrated into the host's DNA but is not actively replicating and thus is not inhibited by antiviral drugs. Similarly, these latent viruses are not detected by the immune system. In this Review, we discuss HIV-1 latency and the mechanisms that allow this pathogenic retrovirus to hide and persist by exploiting the cellular vehicles of immunological memory.

Indexed as

Virus LatencyAnti-HIV AgentsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansTranscription, GeneticVirus IntegrationAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID24243012
PMCPMC4361081
OpenAlexW2049653440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.