Trial reportWiener klinische Wochenschrift2014
Patient-reported outcome reference values for patients after kidney transplantation.
Trial report in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Non-Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Barriers and Predictors.Annals of transplantation · 2021Article
- Evaluation of real-time use of electronic patient-reported outcome data by nurses with patients in home dialysis clinics.BMC health services research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) are important in managing kidney transplant patients. Although, there are many instruments available to assess PROs, such as health-related quality of life (HRQOL), they are rarely collected in routine nephrology practices. Therefore, the aim of this study was the determination of reference values for physical and psychosocial symptom burden in kidney transplant patients.
methodsPatients with a history of kidney transplantation being in aftercare at a nephrological outpatient unit (n = 120) were consecutively recruited, and a computer-based PRO assessment was used to assess their HRQOL reference values. It covered a broad range of clinically relevant physical and psychological symptoms, adherence to immunosuppressants, and disease-specific quality of life. On an average, PROs were assessed 2.9 times per patient, 351 times in total.
resultsFor PRO monitoring in kidney transplant patients, we consider the 10th/90th percentile as being of particular clinical relevance, as patients exceeding these scores are likely to be in need of additional care.
conclusionsWith continuously rising survival rates after kidney transplantation, HRQOL of long-term transplant patients becomes increasingly important, and it is generally accepted that HRQOL improves after successful kidney transplantation. We used a computerized PRO monitoring to determine HRQOL reference values for outpatient kidney transplant patients. Routine PRO monitoring may facilitate the identification of patient issues relevant to treatment, and may contribute to improved symptom and side-effect management. Future studies providing detailed PRO values for stratified patient samples are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.