Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24240185›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2013

Detecting and targeting tumor relapse by its resistance to innate effectors at early recurrence.

Timothy Kottke, Nicolas Boisgerault, Rosa Maria Diaz, Oliver Donnelly, Diana Rommelfanger-Konkol, Jose Pulido, Jill Thompson, Debabrata Mukhopadhyay, Roger Kaspar, Matt Coffey and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. APOBEC and Cancer Viroimmunotherapy: Thinking the Unthinkable.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Bioengineered models to study tumor dormancy.Journal of biological engineering · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Timothy Kottke *Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Nicolas Boisgerault *Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Rosa Maria DiazDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Oliver DonnellyCancer Research UK Centre, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Diana Rommelfanger-KonkolDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jose PulidoDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jill ThompsonDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Debabrata MukhopadhyayDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Roger KasparTransDerm, Santa Cruz, California, USA.
Matt CoffeyOncolytics Biotech, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Hardev PandhaFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Alan MelcherCancer Research UK Centre, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Kevin HarringtonThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Peter SelbyCancer Research UK Centre, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Richard VileDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

T Cell Based Carriers for In Vivo Gene Therapy of CancerR01CA107082 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VILE, RICHARD G. · 2005 to 2014
$2.5M
Autoimmunity and anti tumor immunity outside of the melanocyte/melanoma paradigmR01CA132734 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VILE, RICHARD G. · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
Enhancing Systemic Delivery of Oncolytic Viruses for Cancer TherapyR01CA130878 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VILE, RICHARD G. · 2009 to 2013
$1.4M
Enhancing Therapy of Primary and Recurrent Tumors With Systemic Oncolytic VirusR01CA175386 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VILE, RICHARD G. · 2014 to 2018
$1.3M
Cancer Research UK 13244Medical Research Council G0900324NCI NIH HHS R01 CA107082NCI NIH HHS R01 CA130878NCI NIH HHS R01CA130878NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132734NCI NIH HHS R01 CA175386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor recurrence represents a major clinical challenge. Our data show that emergent recurrent tumors acquire a phenotype radically different from that of their originating primary tumors. This phenotype allows them to evade a host-derived innate immune response elicited by the progression from minimal residual disease (MRD) to actively growing recurrence. Screening for this innate response predicted accurately in which mice recurrence would occur. Premature induction of recurrence resensitized MRD to the primary therapy, suggesting a possible paradigm shift for clinical treatment of dormant disease in which the current expectant approach is replaced with active attempts to uncover MRD before evolution of the escape phenotype is complete. By combining screening with second-line treatments targeting innate insensitivity, up to 100% of mice that would have otherwise relapsed were cured. These data may open new avenues for early detection and appropriately timed, highly targeted treatment of tumor recurrence irrespective of tumor type or frontline treatment.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleImmunity, InnateMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualSkin NeoplasmsT-LymphocytesTumor Cells, CulturedTumor Escape

Identifiers

PMID24240185
PMCPMC3891504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.