Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24239995›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences2014

Comparison of microdialysis sampling perfusion fluid components on the foreign body reaction in rat subcutaneous tissue.

Geoffrey D Keeler, Jeannine M Durdik, Julie A Stenken

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Geoffrey D KeelerCell and Molecular Biology Program, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Jeannine M DurdikCell and Molecular Biology Program, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Julie A StenkenCell and Molecular Biology Program, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA. Electronic address: jstenken@uark.edu.
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville · US

Funding

Modulating and Monitoring the Foreign Body Response to ImplantsR01EB014404 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI STENKEN, JULIE A · 2011 to 2014
$1.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB 014404NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB014404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microdialysis sampling is a commonly used technique for collecting solutes from the extracellular space of tissues in laboratory animals and humans. Large molecular weight solutes can be collected using high molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) membranes (100kDa or greater). High MWCO membranes require addition of high molecular weight dextrans or albumin to the perfusion fluid to prevent fluid loss via ultrafiltration. While these perfusion fluid additives are commonly used during microdialysis sampling, the tissue response to the loss of these compounds across the membrane is poorly understood. Tissue reactions to implanted microdialysis sampling probes containing different microdialysis perfusion fluids were compared over a 7-day time period in rats. The base perfusion fluid was Ringer's solution supplemented with either bovine serum albumin (BSA), rat serum albumin (RSA), Dextran-70, or Dextran-500. A significant inflammatory response to Dextran-70 was observed. No differences in the tissue response between BSA and RSA were observed. Among these agents, the BSA, RSA, and Dextran-500 produced a significantly reduced inflammatory response compared to the Dextran-70. This work demonstrates that use of Dextran-70 in microdialysis sampling perfusion fluids should be eliminated and replaced with Dextran-500 or other alternatives.

Indexed as

AnimalsDextransDialysis SolutionsEquipment DesignForeign-Body ReactionIsotonic SolutionsMaleMicrodialysisMolecular WeightRats, Sprague-DawleyRinger's SolutionRisk FactorsSerum Albumin, BovineSubcutaneous TissueTime FactorsDextransDialysis SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsRinger's SolutionSerum Albumin, BovineBiocompatibilityDextranForeign body responseRatSubcutaneous tissue

Identifiers

PMID24239995
PMCPMC4004663
OpenAlexW1969516038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.