Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24239728›Full record

ReviewDrug discovery today2014

Toward better drug repositioning: prioritizing and integrating existing methods into efficient pipelines.

Guangxu Jin, Stephen T C Wong

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug discovery today, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 154 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
154citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
26.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

154 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 414 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. New drugs and their performance 10 years after approval: a systematic analysis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  17. Drug Repurposing: An Emerging Strategy inJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guangxu JinDepartment of Systems Medicine and Bioengineering, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX 77030, USA; NCI Center for Modeling Cancer Development, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Stephen T C WongDepartment of Systems Medicine and Bioengineering, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX 77030, USA; NCI Center for Modeling Cancer Development, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Electronic address: stwong@tmhs.org.
Cornell University · US

Funding

The Core of the Computational BiologyU54CA149196 · NCI · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WONG, STEPHEN TC · 2010 to 2015
$10.6M
High-content Image Analysis and Modeling for RANigenome-wide ScreeningR01CA121225 · NCI · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WONG, STEPHEN TC · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA121225NCI NIH HHS R01 CA121225NCI NIH HHS U54 CA149196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recycling old drugs, rescuing shelved drugs and extending patents' lives make drug repositioning an attractive form of drug discovery. Drug repositioning accounts for approximately 30% of the newly US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs and vaccines in recent years. The prevalence of drug-repositioning studies has resulted in a variety of innovative computational methods for the identification of new opportunities for the use of old drugs. Questions often arise from customizing or optimizing these methods into efficient drug-repositioning pipelines for alternative applications. It requires a comprehensive understanding of the available methods gained by evaluating both biological and pharmaceutical knowledge and the elucidated mechanism-of-action of drugs. Here, we provide guidance for prioritizing and integrating drug-repositioning methods for specific drug-repositioning pipelines.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsDrug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug RepositioningHumans

Identifiers

PMID24239728
PMCPMC4021005
OpenAlexW2012746420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.