Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24239612›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2014

The Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe): an informatics foundation for the science of clinical research.

Ida Sim, Samson W Tu, Simona Carini, Harold P Lehmann, Brad H Pollock, Mor Peleg, Knut M Wittkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Leveraging SNOMED CT for patient cohort identification over heterogeneous EHR data.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  4. Clinical Research Informatics: a Decade-in-Review.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Missing lateral relationships in top-level concepts of an ontology.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020
    Article
  14. Natural Language Processing for the Evaluation of Methodological Standards and Best Practices of EHR-based Clinical Research.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  15. Improving reference prioritisation with PICO recognition.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ida SimDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States. Electronic address: ida.sim@ucsf.edu.
Samson W TuStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Simona CariniDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Harold P LehmannDivision of Health Sciences Informatics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Brad H PollockDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Mor PelegDepartment of Information Systems, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Knut M WittkowskiDepartment of Research Design and Biostatistics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

UCSF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR024131 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOHNSTON, S. CLAIBORNE · 2006 to 2011
$111.2M
Engaging University of California Stakeholders for Biorespository ResearchUL1TR000004 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRANDIS, JENNIFER RUBIN · 2012 to 2015
$78.0M
Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (UL1)UL1RR025005 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2007 to 2011
$75.8M
Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR001079 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2013 to 2017
$60.1M
TRANSFORMING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION TO BENEFIT HUMAN HEALTHUL1RR024143 · NCRR · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI COLLER, BARRY · 2006 to 2011
$49.1M
Transforming Translational Science and Education to Benefit Human HealthUL1TR000043 · NCATS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI COLLER, BARRY · 2012 to 2015
$26.8M
INSTITUTE FOR INTEGRATION OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE: A PARTNERSHIP TO IMPROVE HEALTHUL1RR025767 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A · 2008 to 2011
$23.8M
Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthUL1TR001120 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A, HARGREAVES, KENNETH M · 2013 to 2017
$16.5M
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
The Trial Bank ProjectR01LM006780 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SIM, IDA · 1999 to 2009
$3.5M
Ontology-Based Integration of Human Studies DataR01RR026040 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SIM, IDA · 2009 to 2011
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000004NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000043NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001079NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001120NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR026040NCRR NIH HHS RR026040NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024131NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024131NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024143NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024143NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025005NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR025005NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025767NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR025767NLM NIH HHS LM06780NLM NIH HHS R01 LM006780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, the scientific process for generating, interpreting, and applying knowledge has received less informatics attention than operational processes for conducting clinical studies. The activities of these scientific processes - the science of clinical research - are centered on the study protocol, which is the abstract representation of the scientific design of a clinical study. The Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) is an OWL 2 model of the entities and relationships of study design protocols for the purpose of computationally supporting the design and analysis of human studies. OCRe's modeling is independent of any specific study design or clinical domain. It includes a study design typology and a specialized module called ERGO Annotation for capturing the meaning of eligibility criteria. In this paper, we describe the key informatics use cases of each phase of a study's scientific lifecycle, present OCRe and the principles behind its modeling, and describe applications of OCRe and associated technologies to a range of clinical research use cases. OCRe captures the central semantics that underlies the scientific processes of clinical research and can serve as an informatics foundation for supporting the entire range of knowledge activities that constitute the science of clinical research.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesBiomedical ResearchMedical InformaticsComputational BiologyEvidence-Based MedicineHumansModels, TheoreticalClinical researchClinical research informaticsEligibility criteriaEvidence-based medicineOntologyTrial registration

Identifiers

PMID24239612
PMCPMC4019723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.