Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24239117›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2013

Meiotic double-strand breaks uncover and protect against mitotic errors in the C. elegans germline.

Deanna Stevens, Karen Oegema, Arshad Desai

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Meiosis.WormBook : the online review of C. elegans biology · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The meiotic checkpoint network: step-by-step through meiotic prophase.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deanna StevensLudwig Institute for Cancer Research and Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Karen Oegema
Arshad Desai
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

Training Program in Basic Clinical GeneticsT32GM008666 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HAMILTON, BRUCE A · 1998 to 2021
$8.6M
Kinetochore Specification and FunctionR01GM074215 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DESAI, ARSHAD · 2005 to 2025
$8.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM074215NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074215NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In sexually reproducing multicellular organisms, genetic information is propagated via the germline, the specialized tissue that generates haploid gametes. The C. elegans germline generates gametes in an assembly line-like process-mitotic divisions under the control of the stem cell niche produce nuclei that, upon leaving the niche, enter into meiosis and progress through meiotic prophase [1]. Here, we characterize the effects of perturbing cell division in the mitotic region of the C. elegans germline. We show that mitotic errors result in a spindle checkpoint-dependent cell-cycle delay, but defective nuclei are eventually formed and enter meiosis. These defective nuclei are eliminated by programmed cell death during meiotic prophase. The cell death-based removal of defective nuclei does not require the spindle checkpoint but instead depends on the DNA damage checkpoint. Removal of nuclei resulting from errors in mitosis also requires Spo11, the enzyme that creates double-strand breaks to initiate meiotic recombination. Consistent with this, double-strand breaks are increased in number and persist longer in germlines with mitotic defects. These findings reveal that the process of initiating meiotic recombination inherently selects against nuclei with abnormal chromosomal content generated by mitotic errors, thereby ensuring the genomic integrity of gametes.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedAnimalsApoptosisCaenorhabditis elegansCell NucleusDNA RepairEndodeoxyribonucleasesGerm CellsMeiosisMeiotic Recombination Protein SPO11MitosisM Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsRecombination, GeneticRNA InterferenceRNA, Small InterferingEndodeoxyribonucleasesMeiotic Recombination Protein SPO11RNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID24239117
PMCPMC3885542
OpenAlexW1971855142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.