Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24238873›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2013

Genotype to phenotype via network analysis.

Hannah Carter, Matan Hofree, Trey Ideker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mapping cross-domain drivers of Alzheimer's disease risk through integrated network analysis.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Visual Phenotype-Based Differential Diagnosis Process for Rare Diseases.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah CarterInstitute for Genomic Medicine and Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gillman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States.
Matan Hofree
Trey Ideker

Funding

SYNTHETIC SYSTEMSP50GM085764 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HASTY, JEFF M, IDEKER, TREY · 2010 to 2018
$23.3M
TR&D 3 - Network Guided Machine LearningP41GM103504 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2012 to 2024
$17.3M
Cytoscape: A Modeling Platform for Biomolecular NetworksR01GM070743 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2004 to 2016
$5.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103504NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM085764NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prime objective of genomic medicine is the identification of disease-causing mutations and the mechanisms by which such events result in disease. As most disease phenotypes arise not from single genes and proteins but from a complex network of molecular interactions, a priori knowledge about the molecular network serves as a framework for biological inference and data mining. Here we review recent developments at the interface of biological networks and mutation analysis. We examine how mutations may be treated as a perturbation of the molecular interaction network and what insights may be gained from taking this perspective. We review work that aims to transform static networks into rich context-dependent networks and recent attempts to integrate non-coding RNAs into such analysis. Finally, we conclude with an overview of the many challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksMutationGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHumansModels, GeneticPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID24238873
PMCPMC3866044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.