Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24238717›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance abuse treatment2014

Criminal justice outcomes after engagement in outpatient substance abuse treatment.

Deborah W Garnick, Constance M Horgan, Andrea Acevedo, Margaret T Lee, Lee Panas, Grant A Ritter, Robert Dunigan, Alfred Bidorini, Kevin Campbell, Karin Haberlin and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Deborah W GarnickInstitute for Behavioral Health, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University. Electronic address: garnick@brandeis.edu.
Constance M HorganInstitute for Behavioral Health, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University.
Andrea AcevedoInstitute for Behavioral Health, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University.
Margaret T LeeInstitute for Behavioral Health, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University.
Lee PanasInstitute for Behavioral Health, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University.
Grant A RitterInstitute for Behavioral Health, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University.
Robert DuniganInstitute for Behavioral Health, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University.
Alfred BidoriniConnecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services.
Kevin CampbellWashington State Department of Social and Health Services, The Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery.
Karin HaberlinConnecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services.
Alice HuberWashington State Department of Social and Health Services, The Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery.
Dawn Lambert-WaceyNew York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services, Division of Outcome Management and System Investment.
Tracy LeeperOklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services.
Mark ReynoldsOklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services.
David WrightOklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services.

Funding

Washington Circle Performance Measures and Criminal Justice OutcomesR01AA017177 · NIAAA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI GARNICK, DEBORAH W. · 2009 to 2011
$1.3M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017177NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA017177-01A2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between engagement in outpatient treatment facilities in the public sector and subsequent arrest is examined for clients in Connecticut, New York, Oklahoma and Washington. Engagement is defined as receiving another treatment service within 14 days of beginning a new episode of specialty treatment and at least two additional services within the next 30 days. Data are from 2008 and survival analysis modeling is used. Survival analyses express the effects of model covariates in terms of "hazard ratios," which reflect a change in the likelihood of outcome because of the covariate. Engaged clients had a significantly lower hazard of any arrest than non-engaged in all four states. In NY and OK, engaged clients also had a lower hazard of arrest for substance-related crimes. In CT, NY, and OK engaged clients had a lower hazard of arrest for violent crime. Clients in facilities with higher engagement rates had a lower hazard of any arrest in NY and OK. Engaging clients in outpatient treatment is a promising approach to decrease their subsequent criminal justice involvement.

Indexed as

Criminal LawAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsSubstance-Related DisordersSurvival AnalysisArrestCriminal justiceEngagementOutcomesPerformance measureSubstance abuse

Identifiers

PMID24238717
PMCPMC3947052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.