Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24238646›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2014

Quantitative computed tomography-derived clusters: redefining airway remodeling in asthmatic patients.

Sumit Gupta, Ruth Hartley, Umair T Khan, Amisha Singapuri, Beverly Hargadon, William Monteiro, Ian D Pavord, Ana R Sousa, Richard P Marshall, Deepak Subramanian and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Vascular remodeling in asthma: from mechanisms to precision medicine.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A Novel Computed Tomography Score Reveals More about Air Trapping in Asthma.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sumit GuptaDepartment of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; Radiology Department, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom. Electronic address: drsumitgupta@yahoo.com.
Ruth HartleyDepartment of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Umair T KhanDepartment of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Amisha SingapuriDepartment of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Beverly HargadonDepartment of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
William MonteiroDepartment of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Ian D PavordDepartment of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Ana R SousaRespiratory Therapy Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.
Richard P MarshallRespiratory Therapy Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.
Deepak SubramanianDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, United Kingdom.
David ParrDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, United Kingdom.
James J EntwisleRadiology Department, Wellington Hospital, Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand.
Salman SiddiquiDepartment of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Vimal RajRadiology Department, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Christopher E BrightlingDepartment of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
University of Leicester · GBCoventry (United Kingdom) · GBGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBCapital and Coast District Health Board · NZGlenfield Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsthma heterogeneity is multidimensional and requires additional tools to unravel its complexity. Computed tomography (CT)-assessed proximal airway remodeling and air trapping in asthmatic patients might provide new insights into underlying disease mechanisms.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to explore novel, quantitative, CT-determined asthma phenotypes.

methodsSixty-five asthmatic patients and 30 healthy subjects underwent detailed clinical, physiologic characterization and quantitative CT analysis. Factor and cluster analysis techniques were used to determine 3 novel, quantitative, CT-based asthma phenotypes.

resultsPatients with severe and mild-to-moderate asthma demonstrated smaller mean right upper lobe apical segmental bronchus (RB1) lumen volume (LV) in comparison with healthy control subjects (272.3 mm(3) [SD, 112.6 mm(3)], 259.0 mm(3) [SD, 53.3 mm(3)], 366.4 mm(3) [SD, 195.3 mm(3)], respectively; P = .007) but no difference in RB1 wall volume (WV). Air trapping measured based on mean lung density expiratory/inspiratory ratio was greater in patients with severe and mild-to-moderate asthma compared with that seen in healthy control subjects (0.861 [SD, 0.05)], 0.866 [SD, 0.07], and 0.830 [SD, 0.06], respectively; P = .04). The fractal dimension of the segmented airway tree was less in asthmatic patients compared with that seen in control subjects (P = .007). Three novel, quantitative, CT-based asthma clusters were identified, all of which demonstrated air trapping. Cluster 1 demonstrates increased RB1 WV and RB1 LV but decreased RB1 percentage WV. On the contrary, cluster 3 subjects have the smallest RB1 WV and LV values but the highest RB1 percentage WV values. There is a lack of proximal airway remodeling in cluster 2 subjects.

conclusionsQuantitative CT analysis provides a new perspective in asthma phenotyping, which might prove useful in patient selection for novel therapies.

Indexed as

Airway RemodelingAdultAgedAsthmaCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeTomography, X-Ray Computedairway remodelingAsthmacluster analysisCTdistal airwayfractal analysisphenotypesquantitative imaging

Identifiers

PMID24238646
PMCPMC3969578
OpenAlexW2172156413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.