Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24238371›Full record

ArticleThe journal of sexual medicine2014

Use of withdrawal (coitus interruptus) for both pregnancy and HIV prevention among young adults in Rakai, Uganda.

Jenny A Higgins, Laura Gregor, Sanyukta Mathur, Neema Nakyanjo, Fred Nalugoda, John S Santelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of sexual medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jenny A HigginsUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Laura Gregor
Sanyukta Mathur
Neema Nakyanjo
Fred Nalugoda
John S Santelli

Funding

Infrastructure for Population Research at PrincetonR24HD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MASSEY, DOUGLAS S · 2004 to 2013
$7.3M
Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD047873 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Katherine J. Curtis · 2014 to 2026
$5.1M
Development CoreP2CHD058486 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Jennifer S Hirsch, Julien O Teitler · 2014 to 2026
$4.3M
BUILDING INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH CAREER IN WOMEN'S HEALTH (BIRCWH) SCHOLARSK12HD055894 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURNSIDE, ELIZABETH S · 2007 to 2016
$4.1M
Rakai Adolescent Project (RAP)R01HD061092 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SANTELLI, JOHN S. · 2009 to 2013
$2.3M
Columbia Population Research CenterR24HD058486 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI GARFINKEL, IRWIN · 2009 to 2013
$1.1M
NICHD NIH HHS 5R01HD061092NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055894NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD047873NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD058486NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061092NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD047879NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD058486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough understudied in the context of AIDS, use of withdrawal (coitus interruptus) with or in place of other prevention methods affects exposure to both pregnancy and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

aimWe used mixed methods to assess use of withdrawal among 15-24-year-olds in a rural Ugandan setting with considerable HIV prevalence.

methodsWe measured withdrawal reporting among (i) sexually active 15-24-year-olds enrolled in a quantitative community survey (n = 6,722) and (ii) in-depth qualitative interview participants systematically selected from the latest round of the community survey (N = 60). Respondents were asked about family planning and HIV prevention practices, including a direct question about withdrawal in the in-depth interviews.

main outcome measuresThe main outcome measures were reports of current use of withdrawal on the quantitative survey (general question about family planning methods) and reports of current or recent use withdrawal in qualitative interviews (specific question about withdrawal). Qualitative interviews also probed for factors associated with withdrawal use.

resultsAlthough less than 1% of quantitative survey participants spontaneously named withdrawal as their current family planning method, 48% of qualitative interview respondents reported current or lifetime use of withdrawal. Withdrawal was often used as a pleasurable alternative to condoms, when condoms were not available, and/or as a "placeholder" method before obtaining injectable contraception. A few respondents described using withdrawal to reduce HIV risk.

conclusionQualitative findings revealed widespread withdrawal use among young adults in Rakai, mainly as a condom alternative. Thus, withdrawal may shape exposure to both pregnancy and HIV. Future behavioral surveys should assess withdrawal practices directly--and separately from other contraceptives and HIV prevention methods. Further clinical research should further document withdrawal's association with HIV risk.

Indexed as

Coitus InterruptusAdolescentCondomsContraceptionFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMalePregnancyPrevalenceRural PopulationUgandaYoung AdultHIV/AIDSPregnancy PreventionSexual BehaviorSexual Risk ReductionUgandaWithdrawal (Coitus Interruptus)

Identifiers

PMID24238371
PMCPMC4025983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.