SynthesisBMC pediatrics2013
Probiotics for infantile colic: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03326297 (Effectiveness of Manual Therapy Through Osteopathy in the Treatment of Infant Colic.), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of Manual Therapy Through Osteopathy in the Treatment of Infant Colic.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probiotics for preventing and treating infant regurgitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Maternal & child nutrition · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison of common interventions for the treatment of infantile colic: a systematic review of reviews and guidelines.BMJ open · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 for infantile colic: Systematic review with network meta-analysis.Medicine · 2017Pooled it
- The use of probiotics in pediatric gastroenterology: a review of the literature and recommendations by Latin-American experts.Paediatric drugs · 2015Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Efficacy of a mixture of simethicone and tyndallized bacillus coagulans in infant colic: a pilot study on behalf of Italian Society of Pediatrics (SIP).Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Observational
- Probiotics in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Review
- Review
- Nine-Strain Bacterial Synbiotic Improves Crying and Lowers Fecal Calprotectin in Colicky Babies-An Open-Label Randomized Study.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- The effect of symbiotic in the treatment of infantile colic: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2022Article
- A comparison of two assessment tools used in overviews of systematic reviews: ROBIS versus AMSTAR-2.Systematic reviews · 2021Review
- Management of the Most Common Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders in Infancy: The Middle East Expert Consensus.Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2021Review
- Infantile Colic-The Perspective of German and Polish Pediatricians in 2020.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Effectiveness of probiotics in infantile colic: A rapid review.Paediatrics & child health · 2020Review
- An overview of systematic reviews of complementary and alternative therapies for infantile colic.Systematic reviews · 2019Review
- Early Probiotic Supplementation and the Risk of Celiac Disease in Children at Genetic Risk.Nutrients · 2019Article
- Paper incompletely describes evidence-based usage of probiotics.Gut microbes · 2018Article
- Use of infant formula in the ELFE study: The association with social and health-related factors.Maternal & child nutrition · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfantile colic is a common paediatric condition which causes significant parental distress. Increased intestinal coliform colonization in addition to alteration in Lactobacillus abundance and distribution may play an important role in its pathogenesis. The objectives of this systematic review are to evaluate the efficacy of probiotic supplementation in the reduction of crying time and successful treatment of infantile colic.
methodsLiterature searches were conducted of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Only randomized controlled trials enrolling term, healthy infants with colic were included. A meta-analysis of included trials was performed utilizing the Cochrane Collaboration methodology.
resultsThree trials that enrolled 220 breastfed infants met inclusion criteria, of which 209 infants were available for analysis. Two of the studies were assessed as good quality. Lactobacillus reuteri (strains-American Type Culture Collection Strain 55730 and DSM 17 938) was the only species utilized in the therapeutic intervention. Two of the trials were industry funded. Probiotic supplementation compared to simethicone or placebo significantly and progressively shortened crying times to 7 days reaching a plateau at three weeks post initiation of therapy [mean difference -56.03 minutes; 95% CI (-59.92, -52.15)]. Similarly, probiotics compared to placebo significantly increased the treatment success of infantile colic with a relative risk (RR) of 0.06; 95% CI (0.01, 0.25) and a number needed to treat of 2.
conclusionsAlthough L. reuteri may be effective as a treatment strategy for crying in exclusively breastfed infants with colic, the evidence supporting probiotic use for the treatment of infant colic or crying in formula-fed infants remains unresolved. Results from larger rigorously designed studies will help draw more definitive conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.