Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24238101›Full record

SynthesisBMC pediatrics2013

Probiotics for infantile colic: a systematic review.

Jasim Anabrees, Flavia Indrio, Bosco Paes, Khalid AlFaleh

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03326297 (Effectiveness of Manual Therapy Through Osteopathy in the Treatment of Infant Colic.), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03326297 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Manual Therapy Through Osteopathy in the Treatment of Infant Colic.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de AlmeriaRan2017 to 2020Enrolled120ConditionsInfantile Colic, Manual TherapyArmsOsteopathy manual therapy, Measures to support and education to the family
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Probiotics in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  9. Paediatrics & child health · 2022
    Review
  10. Paediatrics & child health · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. The effect of symbiotic in the treatment of infantile colic: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Infantile Colic-The Perspective of German and Polish Pediatricians in 2020.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jasim AnabreesNeonatal Care, Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Group, Arrayan Hospital, P,O, Box 272069, Riyadh, 11352, Saudi Arabia. jasim1800@yahoo.com.
Flavia Indrio
Bosco Paes
Khalid AlFaleh
King Saud University · SAMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfantile colic is a common paediatric condition which causes significant parental distress. Increased intestinal coliform colonization in addition to alteration in Lactobacillus abundance and distribution may play an important role in its pathogenesis. The objectives of this systematic review are to evaluate the efficacy of probiotic supplementation in the reduction of crying time and successful treatment of infantile colic.

methodsLiterature searches were conducted of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Only randomized controlled trials enrolling term, healthy infants with colic were included. A meta-analysis of included trials was performed utilizing the Cochrane Collaboration methodology.

resultsThree trials that enrolled 220 breastfed infants met inclusion criteria, of which 209 infants were available for analysis. Two of the studies were assessed as good quality. Lactobacillus reuteri (strains-American Type Culture Collection Strain 55730 and DSM 17 938) was the only species utilized in the therapeutic intervention. Two of the trials were industry funded. Probiotic supplementation compared to simethicone or placebo significantly and progressively shortened crying times to 7 days reaching a plateau at three weeks post initiation of therapy [mean difference -56.03 minutes; 95% CI (-59.92, -52.15)]. Similarly, probiotics compared to placebo significantly increased the treatment success of infantile colic with a relative risk (RR) of 0.06; 95% CI (0.01, 0.25) and a number needed to treat of 2.

conclusionsAlthough L. reuteri may be effective as a treatment strategy for crying in exclusively breastfed infants with colic, the evidence supporting probiotic use for the treatment of infant colic or crying in formula-fed infants remains unresolved. Results from larger rigorously designed studies will help draw more definitive conclusions.

Indexed as

Limosilactobacillus reuteriRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicColicCryingFemaleHumansInfantInfant FormulaInfant, NewbornMaleMilk, HumanProbioticsResearch DesignTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24238101
PMCPMC4225660
OpenAlexW1963600002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.