ReviewClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2013
Ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis--an update of its clinical effects.
Review in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glucose transport dependency defines a therapeutic vulnerability in JAK2V617F-driven myeloproliferative neoplasms.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Article
- Different inflammatory, fibrotic, and immunological signatures between pre-fibrotic and overt primary myelofibrosis.Haematologica · 2025Article
- Synthesis and Anti-Breast Cancer Potency of Mono- and Bis-(pyrazolyl[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4-ACS omega · 2023Article
- Synthesis of novel mono- and bis-pyrazolylthiazole derivatives as anti-liver cancer agents through EGFR/HER2 target inhibition.BMC chemistry · 2023Article
- Treating Anemic Patients With Myelofibrosis in the New Janus Kinase Inhibitor Era: Current Evidence and Real-world Implications.HemaSphere · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Ruxolitinib versus Best Available Therapy in Treating Primary Myelofibrosis.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2022Article
- Ruxolitinib-based combinations in the treatment of myelofibrosis: worth looking forward to.Annals of hematology · 2020Review
- Remodeling the Bone Marrow Microenvironment - A Proposal for Targeting Pro-inflammatory Contributors in MPN.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- Classical Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms: focus on mutations and JAK2 inhibitors.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2018Review
- Utility of Ruxolitinib in a Child with Chronic Mucocutaneous Candidiasis Caused by a Novel STAT1 Gain-of-Function Mutation.Journal of clinical immunology · 2018Article
- Long-term effects of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy on bone marrow fibrosis in patients with myelofibrosis.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2018Article
- Calreticulin mutant mice develop essential thrombocythemia that is ameliorated by the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib.Leukemia · 2017Article
- Re-examining HSPC1 inhibitors.Cell stress & chaperones · 2017Article
- Managing Patients With Myelofibrosis in the Era of Janus Kinase Inhibitors.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Myelofibrosis (MF), a Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm, is characterized by progressive bone marrow fibrosis and ineffective hematopoiesis. Clinical hallmarks include splenomegaly, anemia, and debilitating symptoms. In 2 randomized phase III studies, the Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib significantly improved splenomegaly and disease-related symptoms compared with placebo (Controlled Myelofibrosis Study with Oral JAK Inhibitor Treatment [COMFORT-I]) or best available therapy (COMFORT-II) in patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF. Although ruxolitinib therapy was associated with dose-dependent anemia and thrombocytopenia, these adverse events rarely led to treatment discontinuation. This update of the clinical effects of ruxolitinib in patients with MF was based on original articles and meeting abstracts published after the primary publication of the COMFORT trials in March 2012. Long-term follow-up data from the COMFORT trials and clinical experience with ruxolitinib in unselected patient populations suggest that improvement of splenomegaly and symptoms is durable. Patients benefit from ruxolitinib therapy across subgroups defined by age, MF type, risk category, performance status, JAK2 V617F mutation status, extent of splenomegaly, or presence of cytopenias. In COMFORT-I, platelet counts stabilized with dose adjustments, and hemoglobin levels gradually recovered to slightly below baseline after the first 8 to 12 weeks of therapy. After initial increases, the need for red blood cell transfusions decreased to a level similar to that found in the placebo group. The 2-year follow-up data from the COMFORT trials suggest that patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF receiving ruxolitinib therapy may have improved survival compared with those receiving no (placebo) or traditional therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.