Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24237919›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2013

Public health research implementation and translation: evidence from practice-based research networks.

Glen P Mays, Rachel A Hogg, Doris M Castellanos-Cruz, Anna G Hoover, Lizeth C Fowler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Interorganizational Networks in Physical Activity Promotion: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cross fertilisation of Public Health and Translational Research.Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. A partnership of two U.S. research networks to improve public health.American journal of preventive medicine · 2013
    Article
  20. Multisector Health Policy Networks in 15 Large US Cities.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Glen P MaysDepartment of Health Services Management, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Rachel A Hogg
Doris M Castellanos-Cruz
Anna G Hoover
Lizeth C Fowler

Funding

Vascular Mechanisms of PCB-Induced Brain MetastasesP42ES007380 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI PEARSON, KEVIN JOSEPH · 1997 to 2024
$47.8M
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000117 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$13.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000117NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000117NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES007380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch on how best to deliver efficacious public health strategies in heterogeneous community and organizational contexts remains limited. Such studies require the active engagement of public health practice settings in the design, implementation, and translation of research. Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) provide mechanisms for research engagement, but until now they have not been tested in public health settings. PURPOSE: This study uses data from participants in 14 public health PBRNs and a national comparison group of public health agencies to study processes influencing the engagement of public health settings in research implementation and translation activities.

methodsA cross-sectional network analysis survey was fielded with participants in public health PBRNs approximately 1 year after network formation (n=357) and with a nationally representative comparison group of U.S. local health departments not participating in PBRNs (n=625). Hierarchic regression models were used to estimate how organizational attributes and PBRN network structures influence engagement in research implementation and translation activities. Data were collected in 2010-2012 and analyzed in 2012.

resultsAmong PBRN participants, both researchers and practice agencies reported high levels of engagement in research activities. Local public health agencies participating in PBRNs were two to three times more likely than nonparticipating agencies to engage in research implementation and translation activities (p<0.05). Participants in less densely connected PBRN networks and in more peripheral locations within these networks reported higher levels of research engagement, greater perceived benefits from engagement, and greater likelihood of continued participation.

conclusionsPBRN networks can serve as effective mechanisms for facilitating research implementation and translation among public health practice settings.

Indexed as

Public HealthCommunity NetworksCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Services ResearchHumansPublic Health PracticeRegression AnalysisTranslational Research, BiomedicalUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24237919
PMCPMC4366056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.