Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24236994›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2014

Leveraging electronic health records to develop measurements for processes of care.

Ming Tai-Seale, Caroline J Wilson, Laura Panattoni, Nidhi Kohli, Ashley Stone, Dorothy Y Hung, Sukyung Chung

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Visualizing collaborative electronic health record usage for hospitalized patients with heart failure.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ming Tai-SealePalo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, 795 El Camino Real, Ames Building, Palo Alto, CA, 94301.
Caroline J Wilson
Laura Panattoni
Nidhi Kohli
Ashley Stone
Dorothy Y Hung
Sukyung Chung
Palo Alto Medical Foundation · USPalo Alto Institute · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Measuring and Compensating Primary Care Physician EffortK01HS019815 · AHRQ · PALO ALTO MEDICAL FOUNDATION RES INST · PI CHUNG, SUKYUNG · 2012 to 2016
$804k
Primary Care Transformation in a NCQA Certified Patient-Centered Medical HomeR18HS019167 · AHRQ · PALO ALTO MEDICAL FOUNDATION RES INST · PI TAI-SEALE, MING · 2010 to 2011
$600k
AHRQ HHS K01 HS019815AHRQ HHS R18 HS019167AHRQ HHS R18HS019167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the reliability of data in electronic health records (EHRs) for measuring processes of care among primary care physicians (PCPs) and examine the relationship between these measures and clinical outcomes. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingEHR data from 15,370 patients with diabetes, 49,561 with hypertension, in a group practice serving four Northern California counties. STUDY DESIGN/

methodsExploratory factor analysis (EFA) and multilevel analyses of the relationships between processes of care variables and factor scales with control of hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure (BP), and low density lipoprotein (LDL) among patients with diabetes and BP among patients with hypertension. PRINCIPAL

findingsVolume of e-messages, number of days to the third-next-available appointment, and team communication emerged as reliable factors of PCP processes of care in EFA (Cronbach's alpha=0.73, 0.62, and 0.91). Volume of e-messages was associated with higher odds of LDL control (≤100) (OR=1.13, p<.05) among patients with diabetes. Frequent in-person visits were associated with better BP (OR=1.02, p<.01) and LDL control (OR=1.01, p<.01) among patients with diabetes, and better BP control (OR=1.04, p<.01) among patients with hypertension.

conclusionsThe EHR offers process of care measures which can augment patient-reported measures of patient-centeredness. Two of them are significantly associated with clinical outcomes. Future research should examine their association with additional outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsBlood PressureCaliforniaCholesterol, LDLCommunicationDiabetes MellitusElectronic Health RecordsFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHealth StatusHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedCholesterol, LDLGlycated Hemoglobinelectronic health recordspatient-centered carePrimary care

Identifiers

PMID24236994
PMCPMC3976190
OpenAlexW1991842124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.