Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24236184›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Molecular typing of lung adenocarcinoma on cytological samples using a multigene next generation sequencing panel.

Aldo Scarpa, Katarzyna Sikora, Matteo Fassan, Anna Maria Rachiglio, Rocco Cappellesso, Davide Antonello, Eliana Amato, Andrea Mafficini, Matilde Lambiase, Claudia Esposito and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Dual Effect ofBiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Potential Regulation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genomic profiling in oncology clinical practice.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Salvaging the supernatant: next generation cytopathology for solid tumor mutation profiling.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Aldo ScarpaARC-NET Research Centre, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Katarzyna Sikora
Matteo Fassan
Anna Maria Rachiglio
Rocco Cappellesso
Davide Antonello
Eliana Amato
Andrea Mafficini
Matilde Lambiase
Claudia Esposito
Emilio Bria
Francesca Simonato
Maria Scardoni
Giona Turri
Marco Chilosi
Giampaolo Tortora
Ambrogio Fassina
Nicola Normanno

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of driver mutations in lung adenocarcinoma has led to development of targeted agents that are already approved for clinical use or are in clinical trials. Therefore, the number of biomarkers that will be needed to assess is expected to rapidly increase. This calls for the implementation of methods probing the mutational status of multiple genes for inoperable cases, for which limited cytological or bioptic material is available. Cytology specimens from 38 lung adenocarcinomas were subjected to the simultaneous assessment of 504 mutational hotspots of 22 lung cancer-associated genes using 10 nanograms of DNA and Ion Torrent PGM next-generation sequencing. Thirty-six cases were successfully sequenced (95%). In 24/36 cases (67%) at least one mutated gene was observed, including EGFR, KRAS, PIK3CA, BRAF, TP53, PTEN, MET, SMAD4, FGFR3, STK11, MAP2K1. EGFR and KRAS mutations, respectively found in 6/36 (16%) and 10/36 (28%) cases, were mutually exclusive. Nine samples (25%) showed concurrent alterations in different genes. The next-generation sequencing test used is superior to current standard methodologies, as it interrogates multiple genes and requires limited amounts of DNA. Its applicability to routine cytology samples might allow a significant increase in the fraction of lung cancer patients eligible for personalized therapy.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMultilocus Sequence TypingAdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma of LungAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionMutationNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID24236184
PMCPMC3827450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.