Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24235189›Full record

ReviewCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2013

Approach to identifying and managing atherogenic dyslipidemia: a metabolic consequence of obesity and diabetes.

N John Bosomworth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Management of Statin Intolerance in 2018: Still More Questions Than Answers.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. COSMIC project: consensus on the objectives of the metabolic syndrome in clinic.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Atherogenic Dyslipidemia and Residual Vascular Risk in Practice of Family Doctor.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evolution of lipid management guidelines: evidence might set you free.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

N John Bosomworth3413 Forsyth Dr, Penticton, BC V2A 8Z2. john.bosomworth@interiorhealth.ca.
Interior Health · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the evidence for recognition and management of atherogenic dyslipidemia. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: High-quality randomized trials and meta-analyses were available to address most questions. North American and European guidelines were reviewed. Of these, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society lipid guidelines were most congruent with current literature. MAIN MESSAGE: Atherogenic dyslipidemia is characterized by low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), high levels of triglycerides, and a high low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle number. The condition is highly associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and is poorly reflected in Framingham risk score and LDL measurements. Obesity, glucose intolerance, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome are rapidly becoming more common, and are often associated with atherogenic dyslipidemia, affecting long-term CVD risk. Recognition in the office is best achieved by non-HDL or total cholesterol-HDL ratio testing. Treatment success lies in optimizing diet and exercise. Of available medications, statins produce the most benefit and can be titrated to patient tolerance rather than to LDL target levels, which have a poor evidence base. The addition of fenofibrate can be considered in patients with high triglyceride and low HDL levels who have responded poorly to or have not tolerated statins.

conclusionGrowing obesity prevalence creates a CVD risk that might be missed by LDL cholesterol testing alone. Simple calculations from results of a non-fasting lipid panel produce non-HDL levels and total cholesterol-HDL ratio, both of which are superior for predicting risk in all patients. These metrics should be available in lipid panels.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DyslipidemiasGlucose IntoleranceHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypolipidemic AgentsMetabolic SyndromeObesityTriglyceridesCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypolipidemic AgentsTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID24235189
PMCPMC3828092
OpenAlexW2123993085

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.