Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24234489›Full record

ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2013

Seroadaptation among men who have sex with men: emerging research themes.

Susan Cassels, David A Katz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Gonorrhea in Canada, 2010-2015.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2018
    Article
  13. Infectious and congenital syphilis in Canada, 2010-2015.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Susan Cassels
David A Katz

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kenneth Sherr · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Methods and Data CoreR24HD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ELLIS, JOHN MARK · 2002 to 2016
$9.3M
Migration to Urban Slums, Sexual Networks, and HIV in GhanaR00HD057553 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CASSELS, SUSAN LYNN · 2010 to 2012
$700k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NICHD NIH HHS 5R24HD042828NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD057533NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD057553NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seroadaptation describes a diverse set of potentially harm-reducing behaviors that use HIV status to inform sexual decision making. Men who have sex with men (MSM) in many settings adopt these practices, but their effectiveness at preventing HIV transmission is debated. Past modeling studies have demonstrated that serosorting is only effective at preventing HIV transmission when most men accurately know their HIV status, but additional modeling is needed to address the effectiveness of broader seroadaptive behaviors. The types of information withwhichMSMmake seroadaptive decisions is expanding to include viral load, treatment status, and HIV status based on home-use tests, and recent research has begun to examine the entire seroadaptive process, from an individual's intentions to seroadapt to their behaviors to their risk of acquiring or transmitting HIV and other STIs. More research is needed to craft clear public health messages about the risks and benefits of seroadaptive practices.

Indexed as

HIV SerosortingHomosexuality, MaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleSexual Partners

Identifiers

PMID24234489
PMCPMC3946930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.