Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24234440›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2014

The evolution of the ribosome biogenesis pathway from a yeast perspective.

Ingo Ebersberger, Stefan Simm, Matthias S Leisegang, Peter Schmitzberger, Oliver Mirus, Arndt von Haeseler, Markus T Bohnsack, Enrico Schleiff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Impact of Genome Reduction in Microsporidia.Experientia supplementum (2012) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ingo EbersbergerInstitute for Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Goethe University, Frankfurt 60438, Germany, Center for Integrative Bioinformatics, Max F Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna 1030, Austria, Institute for Molecular Biosciences, Goethe University, Frankfurt 60438, Germany, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Vienna, Vienna 1030, Austria, Cluster of Excellence Macromolecular Complexes, Goethe University, Frankfurt 60438, Germany, Department of Biochemistry I, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen 37073, Germany and Center of Membrane Proteomics, Goethe University, Frankfurt 60438, Germany.
Stefan Simm
Matthias S Leisegang
Peter Schmitzberger
Oliver Mirus
Arndt von Haeseler
Markus T Bohnsack
Enrico Schleiff

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ribosome biogenesis is fundamental for cellular life, but surprisingly little is known about the underlying pathway. In eukaryotes a comprehensive collection of experimentally verified ribosome biogenesis factors (RBFs) exists only for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Far less is known for other fungi, animals or plants, and insights are even more limited for archaea. Starting from 255 yeast RBFs, we integrated ortholog searches, domain architecture comparisons and, in part, manual curation to investigate the inventories of RBF candidates in 261 eukaryotes, 26 archaea and 57 bacteria. The resulting phylogenetic profiles reveal the evolutionary ancestry of the yeast pathway. The oldest core comprising 20 RBF lineages dates back to the last universal common ancestor, while the youngest 20 factors are confined to the Saccharomycotina. On this basis, we outline similarities and differences of ribosome biogenesis across contemporary species. Archaea, so far a rather uncharted domain, possess 38 well-supported RBF candidates of which some are known to form functional sub-complexes in yeast. This provides initial evidence that ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes and archaea follows similar principles. Within eukaryotes, RBF repertoires vary considerably. A comparison of yeast and human reveals that lineage-specific adaptation via RBF exclusion and addition characterizes the evolution of this ancient pathway.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularArchaeaEukaryotaGene DuplicationHumansPhylogenyProtein Structure, TertiaryRibosomesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24234440
PMCPMC3919561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.