ArticleNeuropediatrics2014
Posterior fossa in primary microcephaly: relationships between forebrain and mid-hindbrain size in 110 patients.
Article in Neuropediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated Immunofluorescence Staining for Analysis of Mitotic Stages and Division Orientation in Brain Sections.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Enhanced cortical neural stem cell identity through short SMAD and WNT inhibition in human cerebral organoids facilitates emergence of outer radial glial cells.Nature cell biology · 2022Article
- The potential contribution of impaired brain glucose metabolism to congenital Zika syndrome.Journal of anatomy · 2019Review
- Developmental protein kinase C hyper-activation results in microcephaly and behavioral abnormalities in zebrafish.Translational psychiatry · 2018Article
- Potential mechanisms of Zika-linked microcephaly.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2017Review
- Aspm sustains postnatal cerebellar neurogenesis and medulloblastoma growth in mice.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Microcephalies vary widely in clinical severity and in morphology. The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency of disproportion between the size of the cerebrum and the size of midbrain and hindbrain structures in infants and children with microcephaly, as analysis of such disproportions might aid understanding of these disorders and facilitate testing for specific genetic causes. The relative sizes of the forebrain, each component of the brain stem, and vermis and hemispheres of the cerebellum were analyzed visually on magnetic resonance (MR) images of 110 microcephalic patients. A disproportionally large cerebellum, compared with the cerebrum, was found in 50 cases (45.5%), a proportional cerebellum in 49 cases (44.5%), and a disproportionally small cerebellum in 11 cases (10%). Proportional cerebella were most common in mild (86%) and moderate (55%) microcephaly patients, whereas disproportionately large cerebella were most common in severe (57%) and moderate (32%) microcephaly. Disproportionately small cerebella were seen only in moderate (13%) and severe (9%) microcephaly. As genes are expressed at different times in cerebral and cerebellar development, it is postulated that analysis of relative cerebellar and brain stem size may be useful in the initial analysis of microcephaly by MR images both to categorize and to help determine likely genetic causes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.