ArticleJournal of fluorescence1994
Photobleaching with a subnanosecond laser flash.
Article in Journal of fluorescence, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Myosin head rotation in muscle fibers measured using polarized fluorescence photobleaching recovery.Journal of fluorescence · 1995Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In standard fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) applications for measuring lateral diffusion rates and adsorption/desorption kinetics of fluorescent molecules at biological or model membranes, irreversible bleaching is induced by a bright excitation flash of at least millisecond time scale. It has been presumed that the bleaching event is of a low probability and the significant bleached population that develops during the flash results from each molecule undergoing thousands of excitation/deexcitation cycles before a bleaching event occurs. In some FRAP experiments, notably polarized FRAP (PFRAP) for measuring molecular rotational diffusion rates, it is desirable to use much shorter (subnanosecond) bleaching pulses. However, subnanosecond pulses are shorter than the fluorescence lifetime, so that any fluorophore will experience at most only one visit to the excited state during the bleaching pulse. If bleaching occurs only by the same processes as in slower FRAP experiments, one would thereby expect only minimal bleaching regardless of the bleach intensity. Moreover, the ability of fast polarized pulses to imprint an anisotropic orientational pattern in the postbleach unbleached fluorophore, an ability essential for PFRAP, is not at all guaranteed, particularly if two-photon processes are involved in high-intensity short bleach pulses. In this study, bleaching depths are measured as a function of subnanosecond pulse intensity on a small labeled protein covalently immobilized on fused silica. We show that bright subnanosecond laser flashes do indeed produce significant bleaching, that both two photon effects and reversible bleaching are involved, and that polarized bleaching does produce an anisotropic orientational pattern of unbleached fluorophore. We also postulate a theoretical molecular state model which semiquantitatively accounts for the experimentally observed dependence of reversible bleaching on bleaching pulse intensity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.