Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24232732›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2013

Discovering disease-disease associations by fusing systems-level molecular data.

Marinka Žitnik, Vuk Janjić, Chris Larminie, Blaž Zupan, Nataša Pržulj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Multi-Dimensional Approach to Map Disease Relationships Challenges Classical Disease Views.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Linear functional organization of the omic embedding space.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Towards a data-integrated cell.Nature communications · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marinka ŽitnikFaculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška 25, SI-1000, Slovenia.
Vuk Janjić
Chris Larminie
Blaž Zupan
Nataša Pržulj

Funding

PROJECT III - Computational Analysis of Phenotypes andP01HD039691 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SUCGANG, RICHARD · 2001 to 2016
$14.4M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD039691NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD39691PHS HHS F5-2010-242038PHS HHS III44006PHS HHS J1-5454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of genome-scale genetic and genomic studies allows new insight into disease classification. Recently, a shift was made from linking diseases simply based on their shared genes towards systems-level integration of molecular data. Here, we aim to find relationships between diseases based on evidence from fusing all available molecular interaction and ontology data. We propose a multi-level hierarchy of disease classes that significantly overlaps with existing disease classification. In it, we find 14 disease-disease associations currently not present in Disease Ontology and provide evidence for their relationships through comorbidity data and literature curation. Interestingly, even though the number of known human genetic interactions is currently very small, we find they are the most important predictor of a link between diseases. Finally, we show that omission of any one of the included data sources reduces prediction quality, further highlighting the importance in the paradigm shift towards systems-level data fusion.

Indexed as

DiseaseGene OntologyGeneticsGenomicsHumansSystems Integration

Identifiers

PMID24232732
PMCPMC3828568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.