Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24232258›Full record

ReviewExperimental & molecular medicine2013

Implications and limitations of cellular reprogramming for psychiatric drug development.

Brian T D Tobe, Michael G Brandel, Jeffrey S Nye, Evan Y Snyder

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The genetics of bipolar disorder.Molecular psychiatry · 2020
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The future of neuroepigenetics in the human brain.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian T D Tobe1] Program in Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, Burnham Institute for Medical Research, La Jolla, CA, USA [2] Department of Psychiatry, Veterans Administration Medical Center, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Michael G Brandel
Jeffrey S Nye
Evan Y Snyder
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute · USJohnson & Johnson (United States) · US

Funding

Patient-Derived Stem Cells for Phosphoproteomic Profiling NeuropsychopathologyRC2MH090011 · NIMH · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI SNYDER, EVAN Y, WOLF, DIETER A · 2009 to 2011
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS RC2 MH090011NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH090011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) derived from somatic cells of patients have opened possibilities for in vitro modeling of the physiology of neural (and other) cells in psychiatric disease states. Issues in early stages of technology development include (1) establishing a library of cells from adequately phenotyped patients, (2) streamlining laborious, costly hiPSC derivation and characterization, (3) assessing whether mutations or other alterations introduced by reprogramming confound interpretation, (4) developing efficient differentiation strategies to relevant cell types, (5) identifying discernible cellular phenotypes meaningful for cyclic, stress induced or relapsing-remitting diseases, (6) converting phenotypes to screening assays suitable for genome-wide mechanistic studies or large collection compound testing and (7) controlling for variability in relation to disease specificity amidst low sample numbers. Coordination of material for reprogramming from patients well-characterized clinically, genetically and with neuroimaging are beginning, and initial studies have begun to identify cellular phenotypes. Finally, several psychiatric drugs have been found to alter reprogramming efficiency in vitro, suggesting further complexity in applying hiPSCs to psychiatric diseases or that some drugs influence neural differentiation moreso than generally recognized. Despite these challenges, studies utilizing hiPSCs may eventually serve to fill essential niches in the translational pipeline for the discovery of new therapeutics.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingDrug DiscoveryAnimalsAntipsychotic AgentsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMental DisordersAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID24232258
PMCPMC3849573
OpenAlexW1999460808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.