ArticleSurgical endoscopy2014
The prepped vaginal canal may be a sterile conduit for ventral hernia mesh insertion: a prospective comparative study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough still experimental, natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) aims to use the natural orifices for intraabdominal surgery. Pure transvaginal umbilical hernia repair has been reported. However, mesh protection devices were used to minimize mesh contamination during mesh insertion. The authors believe that before widespread implementation of this technique, more foundational research is indicated to establish the sterility of hernia mesh insertion through this route. This prospective study aimed to compare transvaginal ventral hernia mesh insertion sterility with laparoscopic trocar-site insertion sterility to establish baseline data to help promote the safety of NOTES tranvaginal hernia repair.
methodsThis was a prospective descriptive study (Canadian Task Force classification 2A). With institutional review board approval, 10 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic disease were enrolled in the study. Atrium Prolite mesh (polypropylene monofilament) was inserted into the vagina before and after standard surgical preparation with 10 % povidone–iodine. As a control, mesh also was inserted through a prepped laparoscopic port site. The mesh was cultured for bacterial, fungal, and viral contamination. All patients received standard infection prophylaxis that included preoperative intravenous cefazolin and metronidazole.
resultsThe unprepped vaginal canal was cultured and demonstrated normal multiorganism vaginal flora in all 10 cases. Of the 10 skin incision mesh samples, 3 (30 %) grew bacteria, including Staphylococcus lugdunensis, a potentially pathogenic organism. In contrast, none of the prepped vaginal mesh specimens yielded any growth of microorganisms or potential pathogens.
conclusionsThis study showed that a surgically prepped vaginal canal can be a sterile conduit for insertion of polypropylene mesh for transvaginal ventral hernia repair without the use of additional mesh protection. Surprisingly, the prepped vaginal conduit in our patients was more sterile than a prepped skin incision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.