Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24231952›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2014

An expression signature of the angiogenic response in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours: correlation with tumour phenotype and survival outcomes.

D J Pinato, T M Tan, S T K Toussi, R Ramachandran, N Martin, K Meeran, N Ngo, R Dina, R Sharma

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D J PinatoDivision of Experimental Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, W120HS London, UK.
T M TanDepartment of Endocrinology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, W120HS London, UK.
S T K ToussiDivision of Experimental Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, W120HS London, UK.
R RamachandranDepartment of Endocrinology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, W120HS London, UK.
N MartinDepartment of Endocrinology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, W120HS London, UK.
K MeeranDepartment of Endocrinology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, W120HS London, UK.
N NgoDepartment of Pathology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, W120HS London, UK.
R DinaDepartment of Pathology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, W120HS London, UK.
R SharmaDivision of Experimental Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, W120HS London, UK.
Hammersmith Hospital · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) are heterogeneous with respect to biological behaviour and prognosis. As angiogenesis is a renowned pathogenic hallmark as well as a therapeutic target, we aimed to investigate the prognostic and clinico-pathological role of tissue markers of hypoxia and angiogenesis in GEP-NETs.

methodsTissue microarray (TMA) blocks were constructed with 86 tumours diagnosed from 1988 to 2010. Tissue microarray sections were immunostained for hypoxia inducible factor 1α (Hif-1α), vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), carbonic anhydrase IX (Ca-IX) and somatostatin receptors (SSTR) 1-5, Ki-67 and CD31. Biomarker expression was correlated with clinico-pathological variables and tested for survival prediction using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods.

resultsEighty-six consecutive cases were included: 51% male, median age 51 (range 16-82), 68% presenting with a pancreatic primary, 95% well differentiated, 51% metastatic. Higher grading (P=0.03), advanced stage (P<0.001), high Hif-1α and low SSTR-2 expression (P=0.03) predicted for shorter overall survival (OS) on univariate analyses. Stage, SSTR-2 and Hif-1α expression were confirmed as multivariate predictors of OS. Median OS for patients with SSTR-2+/Hif-1α-tumours was not reached after median follow up of 8.8 years, whereas SSTR-2-/Hif-1α+ GEP-NETs had a median survival of only 4.2 years (P=0.006).

conclusionWe have identified a coherent expression signature by immunohistochemistry that can be used for patient stratification and to optimise treatment decisions in GEP-NETs independently from stage and grading. Tumours with preserved SSTR-2 and low Hif-1α expression have an indolent phenotype and may be offered less aggressive management and less stringent follow up.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingNeovascularization, PathologicNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsHIF1A protein, humanHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitReceptors, SomatostatinSSTR2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24231952
PMCPMC3887289
OpenAlexW2039959838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.