Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24231947›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2014

Analysis of plasma cytokines and angiogenic factors in patients with pretreated urothelial cancer receiving Pazopanib: the role of circulating interleukin-8 to enhance the prognostic accuracy.

A Necchi, M Pennati, N Zaffaroni, E Landoni, P Giannatempo, D Raggi, L H Schwartz, C Morosi, F Crippa, E Farè and 11 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

A NecchiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Oncology 2 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, Milan 20133, Italy.
M PennatiDepartment of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
N ZaffaroniDepartment of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
E LandoniClinical Epidemiology and Trials Organization Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
P GiannatempoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Oncology 2 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, Milan 20133, Italy.
D RaggiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Oncology 2 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, Milan 20133, Italy.
L H SchwartzDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
C MorosiDepartment of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
F CrippaNuclear Medicine and PET Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
E FarèDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Oncology 2 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, Milan 20133, Italy.
N NicolaiDepartment of Surgery, Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
R LanocitaDepartment of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
T SavaDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Verona-Borgo Trento, Verona, Italy.
C SaccoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ospedale S. Maria Misericordia, Udine, Italy.
C MessinaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo, Italy.
C OrtegaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment (IRCC), Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
F G De BraudDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Oncology 2 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, Milan 20133, Italy.
R SalvioniDepartment of Surgery, Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
M G DaidoneDepartment of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
A M Gianni1] Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Oncology 2 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, Milan 20133, Italy [2] University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy.
L MarianiClinical Epidemiology and Trials Organization Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPazopanib achieved the end point of clinical activity in pretreated patients with urothelial cancer in a single-group, phase 2 trial. The objective was to identify biological predictors of clinical benefit to pazopanib in these patients.

methodsEDTA blood samples were collected at baseline (T0) and after 4 weeks (T1) of treatment, together with radiological imaging in all 41 patients to analyse plasma circulating angiogenic factor levels by multiplex ELISA plates. Changes from T0 to T1 in marker levels were matched with response with the covariance analysis. Univariable and multivariable analyses evaluated the association with overall survival (OS), adjusted for prespecified clinical variables. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) tested the performance of the recognised Cox model.

resultsIncreasing IL8(T1) level associated with lower response probability at covariance analysis (P=0.010). Both IL8(T0) (P=0.019) and IL8(T1) (P=0.004) associated with OS and the prognostic model, including clinical variables and IL8(T1) best-predicted OS after backward selection. The NRI for this model was 39%.When analysed as a time-varying covariate, IL8(T1) level<80 pg ml(-1) portended significantly greater response (∼80%) and 6-month OS (∼60%) probability than level ≥ 80.

conclusionIL8-level changes during pazopanib allowed for a prognostic improvement and were associated with response probability.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis Inducing AgentsAngiogenesis InhibitorsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Transitional CellCytokinesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansIndazolesInterleukin-8Multimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsPyrimidinesSulfonamidesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsAngiogenesis InhibitorsBiomarkers, TumorCXCL8 protein, humanCytokinesIndazolesInterleukin-8pazopanibPyrimidinesSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID24231947
PMCPMC3887307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.