Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24231618›Full record

ReviewNature chemical biology2013

A peptide's perspective on antigen presentation to the immune system.

Jacques Neefjes, Huib Ovaa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature chemical biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Spatially Informed Gene Signatures for Response to Immunotherapy in Melanoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. New Scabimycins A-C Isolated fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacques NeefjesDivision of Cell Biology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Huib Ovaa
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specific immune responses are critically dependent on protein degradation products in the form of peptides. These peptides are presented by major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs), and recognition of MHC-peptide complexes by the immune system determines successful pathogen elimination, transplant rejection, autoimmunity or death. Here we review the immune response from the peptide's perspective and discuss the fate of peptides in cells before presentation by MHC complexes. We then discuss how peptides are altered post-translationally to yield immune responses and how peptides can be engineered to achieve strong immune responses following vaccination. Although peptides are simple from a chemical perspective, they are complex in their immunological consequences.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigensMajor Histocompatibility ComplexModels, MolecularPeptidesProtein ConformationProtein SubunitsAntigensPeptidesProtein Subunits

Identifiers

PMID24231618
OpenAlexW2083685984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.