Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24231311›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in nephrology and hypertension2014

Kidney injury, stem cells and regeneration.

Benjamin D Humphreys

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Sirtuins play critical and diverse roles in acute kidney injury.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Intravenous administration of iPS-MSCJournal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Biomarker discovery for renal cancer stem cells.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nephrology research--the past, present and future.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Benjamin D HumphreysaRenal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital bHarvard Medical School, Boston cHarvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Hedgehog Signaling in Kidney Homeostasis and RepairR01DK088923 · NIDDK · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI HUMPHREYS, BENJAMIN D. · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK088923NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK088923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe review summarizes the most recent advances in stem cell and regenerative approaches to treat kidney injury, and highlights areas of active controversy. Over the past year, a number of findings have been reported that have brought this field much closer to clinical translation. RECENT

findingsRecent progress in regenerative nephrology includes the directed differentiation of embryonic stem cells to kidney fates, understanding the proliferative capacity of tubules after injury, the use of mesenchymal stem cells for kidney disease and tissue engineering approaches to renal replacement. Controversies persist, however, including whether adult epithelial stem cells exist at all, the best therapeutic strategy for the treatment of kidney injury and how to use mesenchymal stem cells optimally for the prevention of acute kidney injury. SUMMARY: Although recent progress in kidney regeneration is very encouraging, current controversies must be resolved before clinical breakthroughs can occur.

Indexed as

RegenerationAcute Kidney InjuryAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell ProliferationHumansKidneyStem Cell TransplantationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24231311
PMCPMC3980673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.