Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24229805›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2014

Healthcare workers and measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) status: how worried should we be about further outbreaks?

S Basu, P Giri, A Adisesh, R McNAUGHT

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lower Rate of Seropositivity to Measles Among Young Healthcare Personnel in New York City.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. New measles vaccination schedules in the European countries?Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S BasuSheffield Occupational Health Service,Northern General Hospital,Sheffield,UK.
P GiriSheffield Occupational Health Service,Northern General Hospital,Sheffield,UK.
A AdiseshDalhousie Medicine New Brunswick (DMNB),Saint John,Canada.
R McNAUGHTSouth Yorkshire Health Protection Unit,Sheffield,UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, a number of outbreaks of measles and mumps have occurred within the UK and Europe. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of contracting and transmitting disease to patients and staff. To examine this risk at the point of entry to healthcare, we assessed the serological results of new HCWs presenting for pre-placement clearance without evidence of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) immunity between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2012. Overall rates of serological positivity to MMR across all age groups were 88·2%, 68·8% and 93·9%, respectively. With regard to measles and mumps, there were statistically significant decreases in the percentage of HCWs born after 1980 that had positive serology (P < 0·05). No such differences were seen between healthcare groups. Most seronegative HCWs accepted MMR vaccination. Despite our entry-level findings, the ongoing risk of a MMR outbreak within this cohort of HCWs appears low.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksHealth PersonnelOccupational ExposureAdolescentAdultAntibodies, ViralEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMeaslesMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineMiddle AgedMumpsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentAntibodies, ViralMeasles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID24229805
PMCPMC9151187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.