Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24229746›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical psychiatry2013

Antidepressant augmentation using the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist memantine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Eric G Smith, Kristina M Deligiannidis, Christine M Ulbricht, Chelsea S Landolin, Jayendra K Patel, Anthony J Rothschild

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00344682 (A Randomized Double-Blind Pilot Study of Memantine Augmentation in Antidepressant Nonresponders or Incomplete Responders), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00344682 phase4completednot on this map

A Randomized Double-Blind Pilot Study of Memantine Augmentation in Antidepressant Nonresponders or Incomplete Responders

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Massachusetts, WorcesterRan2006 to 2011Enrolled31ConditionsDepressive DisorderArmsmemantine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Memantine for autism spectrum disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. ThePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Antidepressant and anxiolytic potential ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  13. NMDA Receptor Activation-Dependent Antidepressant-Relevant Behavioral and Synaptic Actions of Ketamine.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Memantine in neurological disorders - schizophrenia and depression.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Role of the medial prefrontal cortex in the effects of rapid acting antidepressants on decision-making biases in rodents.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric G SmithDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave North, Worcester, MA 01655 Eric.Smith5@va.gov.
Kristina M Deligiannidis
Christine M Ulbricht
Chelsea S Landolin
Jayendra K Patel
Anthony J Rothschild
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

University of Massachusetts Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000161 · NCATS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LUZURIAGA, KATHERINE F · 2012 to 2015
$11.0M
Neuroendocrine and Neuroimaging Endophenotypes in Postpartum DepressionK23MH097794 · NIMH · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI DELIGIANNIDIS, KRISTINA MARIE · 2013 to 2017
$897k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000161NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH097794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIntravenous N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists have shown promising results in rapidly ameliorating depression symptoms, but placebo-controlled trials of oral NMDA antagonists as monotherapy have not observed efficacy. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the NMDA antagonist memantine as an augmentation treatment for patients with DSM-IV major depressive disorder.

methodAdult outpatients with major depressive disorder and partial response or nonresponse to their current antidepressant (as indicated by a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of ≥ 16 at baseline) were randomized (from July 2006-December 2011) to add memantine (flexible dose 5-20 mg/d, with all memantine group participants reaching the dose of 20 mg/d) (n = 15) or placebo (n = 16) to their existing treatment for 8 weeks. The primary outcome, change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Score (MADRS), was evaluated with repeated-measures mixed effects models using last-observation-carried-forward methods. Secondary outcomes included other depression and anxiety rating scales, suicidal and delusional ideation, and other adverse effects.

results84% of participants completed the trial, including 93% of participants receiving memantine. Participants receiving memantine did not show a statistically or clinically significant change in MADRS scores compared to placebo, either over the entire study (β = 0.133, favoring placebo, P = .74) or at study completion (week 8 mean [SD] MADRS score change = -7.13 [6.61] [memantine]; -7.25 [11.14] [placebo]; P = .97). A minimal to small effect size (comparing change to baseline variability) favoring placebo was observed (Cohen d = 0.19). Similarly, no substantial effect sizes favoring memantine nor statistically significant between-group differences were observed on secondary efficacy outcomes.

conclusionsThis trial did not detect significant statistical or effect size differences between memantine and placebo augmentation among nonresponders or poor responders to conventional antidepressants. While the small number of participants is a limitation, this study suggests memantine lacks substantial efficacy as an augmentation treatment for major depressive disorder.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00344682.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsMajor Depressive DisorderMemantineAdultDepressionDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersDrug MonitoringDrug SynergismDrug Therapy, CombinationExcitatory Amino Acid AgonistsFemaleHumansMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsExcitatory Amino Acid AgonistsMemantineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID24229746
PMCPMC4000742
OpenAlexW2018922460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.