Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24229413›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2013

Odor naming and interpretation performance in 881 schizophrenia subjects: association with clinical parameters.

Anne Kästner, Dörthe Malzahn, Martin Begemann, Constanze Hilmes, Heike Bickeböller, Hannelore Ehrenreich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Brain regions associated with olfactory dysfunction in first episode psychosis patients.The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Disrupted Olfactory Integration in Schizophrenia: Functional Connectivity Study.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neurology issues in schizophrenia.Current psychiatry reports · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne KästnerClinical Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Hermann-Rein-Str,3, 37075 Göttingen, GERMANY. ehrenreich@em.mpg.de.
Dörthe Malzahn
Martin Begemann
Constanze Hilmes
Heike Bickeböller
Hannelore Ehrenreich

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlfactory function tests are sensitive tools for assessing sensory-cognitive processing in schizophrenia. However, associations of central olfactory measures with clinical outcome parameters have not been simultaneously studied in large samples of schizophrenia patients.

methodsIn the framework of the comprehensive phenotyping of the GRAS (Göttingen Research Association for Schizophrenia) cohort, we modified and extended existing odor naming (active memory retrieval) and interpretation (attribute assignment) tasks to evaluate them in 881 schizophrenia patients and 102 healthy controls matched for age, gender and smoking behavior. Associations with emotional processing, neuropsychological test performance and disease outcome were studied.

resultsSchizophrenia patients underperformed controls in both olfactory tasks. Odor naming deficits were primarily associated with compromised cognition, interpretation deficits with positive symptom severity and general alertness. Contrasting schizophrenia extreme performers of odor interpretation (best versus worst percentile; N=88 each) and healthy individuals (N=102) underscores the obvious relationship between impaired odor interpretation and psychopathology, cognitive dysfunctioning, and emotional processing (all p<0.004).

conclusionsThe strong association of performance in higher olfactory measures, odor naming and interpretation, with lead symptoms of schizophrenia and determinants of disease severity highlights their clinical and scientific significance. Based on the results obtained here in an exploratory fashion in a large patient sample, the development of an easy-to-use clinical test with improved psychometric properties may be encouraged.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsOdorantsOlfaction DisordersOlfactory PerceptionSchizophreniaSchizophrenic Psychology

Identifiers

PMID24229413
PMCPMC3765908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.