Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24228747›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2013

The spinal stenosis pedometer and nutrition lifestyle intervention (SSPANLI) randomized controlled trial protocol.

Christy C Tomkins-Lane, Lynne M Z Lafave, Jill A Parnell, Ashok Krishnamurthy, Jocelyn Rempel, Luciana G Macedo, Stephanie Moriartey, Kent J Stuber, Philip M Wilson, Richard Hu and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01902979 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Spinal Stenosis Pedometer and Nutrition e-Health Lifestyle Intervention (SSPANLI) Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMount Royal UniversityRan2013Enrolled88ConditionsLumbar Spinal Stenosis, ObesityArmsLifestyle intervention
NCT02154191 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Level of Activity in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients Pre- and Post-surgery: a Non-randomized Controlled Before-after Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManitobaRan2014Enrolled24ConditionsSpinal StenosisArmsSurgical Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Management of lumbar spinal stenosis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Christy C Tomkins-LaneDepartment of Physical Education and Recreation Studies, Mount Royal University, 4825 Mount Royal Gate SW, Calgary, AB T3E 6K6, Canada. clane@mtroyal.ca.
Lynne M Z Lafave
Jill A Parnell
Ashok Krishnamurthy
Jocelyn Rempel
Luciana G Macedo
Stephanie Moriartey
Kent J Stuber
Philip M Wilson
Richard Hu
Yvette M Andreas
Mount Royal University · CAAlberta Health Services · CABrock University · CACanadian Memorial Chiropractic College · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBecause of symptoms, people with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) are often inactive, and this sedentary behaviour implies risk for diseases including obesity. Research has identified body mass index as the most powerful predictor of function in LSS. This suggests that function may be improved by targeting weight as a modifiable factor. An e-health lifestyle intervention was developed aimed at reducing fat mass and increasing physical activity in people with LSS. The main components of this intervention include pedometer-based physical activity promotion and nutrition education. METHODS/

designThe Spinal Stenosis Pedometer and Nutrition Lifestyle INTERVENTION (SSPANLI) was developed and piloted with 10 individuals. The protocol for a randomized controlled trail comparing the SSPANLI intervention to usual non-surgical care follows. One hundred six (106) overweight or obese individuals with LSS will be recruited. Baseline and follow-up testing includes dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, blood draw, 3-day food record, 7-day accelerometry, questionnaire, maximal oxygen consumption, neurological exam, balance testing and a Self-Paced Walking Test.

interventionDuring Week 1, the intervention group will receive a pedometer, and a personalized consultation with both a Dietitian and an exercise specialist. For 12 weeks participants will log on to the e-health website to access personal step goals, walking maps, nutrition videos, and motivational quotes. Participants will also have access to in-person Coffee Talk meetings every 3 weeks, and meet with the Dietitian and exercise specialist at week 6. The control group will proceed with usual care for the 12-week period. Follow-up testing will occur at Weeks 13 and 24. DISCUSSION: This lifestyle intervention has the potential to provide a unique, non-surgical management option for people with LSS. Through decreased fat mass and increased function, we may reduce risk for obesity, chronic diseases of inactivity, and pain. The use of e-health interventions provides an opportunity for patients to become more involved in managing their own health. Behaviour changes including increased physical activity, and improved dietary habits promote overall health and quality of life, and may decrease future health care needs in this population.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT01902979.

Indexed as

Nutrition AssessmentRisk Reduction BehaviorActigraphyDiet RecordsFeeding BehaviorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityPilot ProjectsSingle-Blind MethodSpinal Stenosis

Identifiers

PMID24228747
PMCPMC4225754
OpenAlexW2012614567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.