Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24228082›Full record

ReviewOntario health technology assessment series2013

Carbon-13 urea breath test for Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with uninvestigated ulcer-like dyspepsia: an evidence-based analysis.

D Ling

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ontario health technology assessment series, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Evolution of Diagnostic Methods forDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. The Prevalence ofJournal of clinical medicine research · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

D Ling

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDyspepsia is a condition defined by chronic pain or discomfort in the upper gastrointestinal tract that can be caused by Helicobacter pylori. The carbon-13 urea breath test (¹³C UBT) is a non-invasive test to detect H. pylori.

objectivesWe aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of the ¹³C UBT in adult patients with ulcer-like dyspepsia who have no alarm features. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid Embase, the Wiley Cochrane Library, and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination database, for studies published between 2003 and 2012. REVIEW

methodsWe abstracted the sensitivity and specificity, which were calculated against a composite reference standard. Summary estimates were obtained using bivariate random effects regression analysis.

resultsFrom 19 diagnostic studies, the ¹³C UBT summary estimates were 98.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.3-99.0) for sensitivity and 95.1% (95% CI, 90.3-97.6) for specificity. In 6 studies that compared the ¹³C UBT with serology, the 1¹³C UBT sensitivity was 95.0% (95% CI, 90.1-97.5) and specificity was 91.6 % (95% CI, 81.3-96.4). The sensitivity and specificity for serology were 92.9% (95% CI, 82.6-97.3) and 71.1% (95% CI, 63.8-77.5), respectively. In 1 RCT, symptom resolution, medication use, and physician visits were similar among the ¹³C UBT, serology, gastroscopy, or empirical treatment arms. However, patients tested with ¹³C UBT reported higher dyspepsia-specific quality of life scores. LIMITATIONS: Processing of the ¹³C UBT results can vary according to many factors. Further, the studies showed significant heterogeneity and used different composite reference standards.

conclusionsThe ¹³C UBT is an accurate test with high sensitivity and specificity. Compared with serology, it has higher specificity. There is a paucity of data on the ¹³C UBT beyond test accuracy. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Breath test for detecting bacteria in patients with ulcer-like symptoms. Dyspepsia is a condition that causes long-term pain or discomfort in the upper abdomen. Symptoms can include heartburn, burping, bloating, nausea, or slow digestion. Dyspepsia can be caused by a bacterium that also causes ulcers and stomach cancer. Half of the world's people are believed to be infected with these bacteria. A test has been developed to detect the bacteria in a breath sample. Our review determined the accuracy of this breath test in adults with ulcer-like symptoms. From 19 studies, the breath test correctly identified 98% of patients with the bacteria and 95% of patients without the bacteria, as determined by a reference standard. Six studies compared the breath test to a blood test that is currently used. Both the breath and blood tests performed well in correctly identifying patients with the bacteria. However, the blood test was incorrectly positive in 20 more patients who did not have the bacteria according to the breath test. This means that more patients would have received unnecessary treatment. Thus, the breath test is an accurate test to detect the bacteria in adult patients who have ulcer-like symptoms. But the many differences among the studies in our review included several steps taken to perform the breath test and the reference standards used to compare a blood test with the breath test.

Indexed as

AdultBreath TestsCarbon IsotopesDyspepsiaFemaleHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansMaleOntarioSensitivity and SpecificityUreaCarbon IsotopesUrea

Identifiers

PMID24228082
PMCPMC3818027
OpenAlexW2125126549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.