Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24228068›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biomedical nanoscience and nanotechnology2013

Nanoparticle toxicity by the gastrointestinal route: evidence and knowledge gaps.

Ingrid L Bergin, Frank A Witzmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biomedical nanoscience and nanotechnology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Cell-derived nanomaterials for biomedical applications.Science and technology of advanced materials · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Pharmacokinetics and tumor delivery of nanoparticles.Journal of drug delivery science and technology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Veterinary nanomedicine: Pros and cons.Veterinary medicine and science · 2023
    Review
  18. Assessment of Pristine Carbon Nanotubes Toxicity in Rodent Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ingrid L BerginUnit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, University of Michigan, 1150 W. Medical Center Dr, 018 ARF, Ann Arbor, MI 48197, USA, ingridbe@med.umich.edu.
Frank A Witzmann

Funding

Nanoparticle Effects on Epithelial Cell Protein Expression and FunctionR01GM085218 · NIGMS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI WITZMANN, FRANK A · 2008 to 2012
$2.1M
Characterization Methodologies & Proteomics to Assess Carbon Nanotube ExposureRC2ES018810 · NIEHS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MITRA, SOMENATH, WITZMANN, FRANK A · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS RC2 ES018810NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing interest in nanoparticles for advanced technologies, consumer products, and biomedical applications has led to great excitement about potential benefits but also concern over the potential for adverse human health effects. The gastrointestinal tract represents a likely route of entry for many nanomaterials, both directly through intentional ingestion or indirectly via nanoparticle dissolution from food containers or by secondary ingestion of inhaled particles. Additionally, increased utilisation of nanoparticles may lead to increased environmental contamination and unintentional ingestion via water, food animals, or fish. The gastrointestinal tract is a site of complex, symbiotic interactions between host cells and the resident microbiome. Accordingly, evaluation of nanoparticles must take into consideration not only absorption and extraintestinal organ accumulation but also the potential for altered gut microbes and the effects of this perturbation on the host. The existing literature was evaluated for evidence of toxicity based on these considerations. Focus was placed on three categories of nanomaterials: nanometals and metal oxides, carbon-based nanoparticles, and polymer/dendrimers with emphasis on those particles of greatest relevance to gastrointestinal exposures.

Indexed as

carbon nanotubescopperdendrimersgastrointestinalgoldingestionnanomaterialsnanometalsnanoparticlesnanotechnologyoralpolymers.QDsquantum dotssilicasilvertitanium dioxidetoxicity

Identifiers

PMID24228068
PMCPMC3822607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.