Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24227845›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2014

A cell-biased effect of estrogen in prion infection.

Brendan Molloy, Hilary E M McMahon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brendan MolloyUCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, Conway Institute for Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Hilary E M McMahon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prion disorders are associated with the accumulation of a misfolded form (PrP(Sc)) of the normal prion protein, PrP(C). Here, we show that estrogen acts as a regulator of the processes of both prion infection and prion maintenance. Estrogen was found to be cell biased in its effect; it protected cells against prion infection in a prevention mode and enabled prion maintenance in a treatment mode. These processes were regulated by the estrogen receptor subtypes Erα and Erβ. By using specific receptor agonists, Erα was found to be the main receptor active in slowing prion infection, whereas in chronically infected cells, although Erα allowed partial maintenance of PrP(Sc) levels, Erβ was the main receptor involved in maintaining PrP(Sc) in a treatment paradigm. A cell-biased effect of estrogen has been reported for other neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease. Estrogen's effect is dependent on the cell's health status, which impacts the use of estrogen. This work also identified that by targeting the estrogen receptors with the selective estrogen receptor modulators tamoxifen (Tam) and 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (OHT), PrP(Sc) could be cleared from prion-infected cell culture. Tam and OHT had half-maximal inhibitory concentrations for clearance of PrP(Sc) of 0.47 μM and 0.14 nM, respectively. This work identifies further factors involved in the prion disease process, and through antagonism of the estrogen system, we demonstrate that the estrogen system is a target for controlling PrP(Sc) levels.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogensMicePrion DiseasesPrPSc ProteinsEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogensPrPSc Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24227845
PMCPMC3911640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.